Putin ups the ante, threatens to develop disputed nukes in response to Trump administration ultimatum
- Russian President Vladimir Putin said Wednesday that he is prepared to develop nuclear-tipped missiles if the U.S. withdraws from a Cold War-era arms agreement.
- Putin's response comes a day after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called on Russia to stop violating the INF treaty and come into compliance within 60 days.
- The arms control agreement prohibits the production or testing of ground-launched cruise missiles with a range of approximately 300 to 3,400 miles.
Russian President Vladimir Putin upped the ante Wednesday by saying he is prepared to develop nuclear-tipped missiles if the U.S. withdraws from a Cold War-era arms agreement.
Putin, in televised comments, said Moscow would develop midrange nuclear missiles, a weapon that is currently banned from U.S. and Russian arsenals under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces, or INF, treaty.
The INF treaty, signed in 1987 between President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev, prohibited the development and deployment of ground-launched nuclear missiles with ranges of 310 miles to 3,420 miles.
President Donald Trump has promised to withdraw from that treaty, claiming Russia has been cheating. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo offered an ultimatum to Russia on Tuesday. The Russian leader suggested the U.S. was the one itching to escalate the arms race.
"Now it seems our American partners believe that the situation has changed so much that the United States must also have such a weapon. What's our response? It's simple: in that case we will also do this," Putin said.
U.S. arms experts said the Kremlin needs to take responsibility.
"Russia's violation is unacceptable and requires a firm U.S. and NATO diplomatic, economic and treaty-compliant military response strategy," Kingston Reif, director of disarmament research at the Arms Control Association, told CNBC following Putin's remarks.
"Russia's had treaty-violating missiles for years, so they're not fooling anybody by alleging that they'd have to start building treaty-violating missiles. It's a transparent ploy to put the onus back on the U.S., but it won't work," said Thomas Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Putin's response came a day after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo cited material evidence that Russia has quietly added nuclear-tipped missiles that are currently banned by the INF treaty to its colossal arsenal.
Russia, Pompeo said, has developed "multiple battalions of the SSC-8 missiles," a move that falls outside of the Cold War-era arms agreement.
"Its range makes it a direct menace to Europe," he said after a meeting with his NATO counterparts.
Pompeo then offered Russia an ultimatum: come into compliance of the agreement within 60 days or the United States will exit the weapons pact.
NATO on Tuesday also called on Moscow to "return urgently to full and verifiable compliance." "It is now up to Russia to preserve the INF Treaty," wrote NATO foreign ministers in a joint statement.
Abigail Stowe-Thurston, a researcher at the Federation of American Scientists, said the U.S. and its allies need to do more. "This ultimatum may buy the United States and its allies time, but this approach, especially without substantial diplomatic engagement, is not likely to convince Russia to return to compliance with the treaty."
Last month, Trump threatened to withdraw from the INF treaty, saying that Russia has violated the arms agreement "for many years." On behalf of the administration, national security advisor John Bolton flew to Moscow to personally deliver the message to the Kremlin.
"It is the American position that Russia is in violation," Bolton told reporters after a meeting with Putin last month. "It is Russia's position that they are not in violation. So one has to ask, 'How do you convince the Russians to come back into compliance with obligations they don't think they're violating?'"