The Mega Millions jackpot is $785 million. Taking the lump sum is 'typically a big mistake,' lottery lawyer says
- With $785 million at stake, this is the fourth-largest jackpot in Mega Millions history.
- Nearly all winners opt for the immediate lump sum, which is "a big mistake," one expert said.
- There are some significant advantages to spreading out the windfall.
This could be a very good year for one lucky winner of the fourth-largest jackpot in Mega Millions history.
And yet, kicking off 2023 with $785 million could have a downside.
"The curse of the lottery losers is very real," said Andrew Stoltmann, a Chicago-based lawyer who has represented several recent lottery winners.
One of the very first decisions a winner must make — whether to accept the jackpot as a lump sum or as an annuity — often ends up being their downfall, Stoltmann said.
The jackpot for Tuesday night's drawing is now the fourth-largest lottery prize ever at an estimated $785 million, if you opt to take your windfall as an annuity spread over three decades. The upfront cash option — which most jackpot winners choose — for this drawing is $403.8 million, as of midday Tuesday.
These days, the annuity option is bigger than it previously was, relative to the cash option, thanks to higher interest rates, which make it possible for the game to fund larger annuitized prizes, according to the Multi-State Lottery Association.
Still, "over 90% of winners take the immediate lump sum," Stoltmann said. "That's typically a big mistake."
Not only does an annuity offer a bigger bang for your buck, but spreading out the payments also gives you a chance to build an experienced team, including an accountant, financial advisor and an attorney to protect the money and your best interests, according to Stoltmann.
"Few lottery winners have the infrastructure in place to manage a lottery windfall," he said.
That ensures a level of financial security that the lump sum does not, even with the inevitable onslaught of solicitations, excessive purchases or bad investments.
"To make a mistake with the first year's winnings is not catastrophic if the winner is going to receive another 29 years' worth of payments," Stoltmann said.
Spreading out the payments is a worthwhile consideration, "especially in light of the math and psychology," said Joe Buhrmann, a certified financial planner and senior financial planning consultant at Fidelity's eMoney Advisor.
"Even if you spend it all, there's another check that comes next year," he said. "There's a great deal of certainty in that."
"The only deduction you have is the cost of your ticket," Buhrmann said.
Of course, you'll pay tax on the annuity checks, as well, but perhaps not as much on the investment income if the government is doing the work for you (essentially by putting the winnings in a portfolio of bonds rather than how you would have invested it).
Although you could likely make more by investing in the market over the same time horizon, there is far less risk since the annuity payments are guaranteed. Even if you die, future payments become part of your estate, just like any other asset.
"Don't get caught up in the nickels and dimes," said Susan Bradley, a CFP and founder of the Sudden Money Institute in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Either way, "the payouts are huge and you will never be the same," she said.
Harvard neuroscientist: The 'most underrated' skill all successful people have—'especially introverts'
Key Fed inflation measure eased in December while consumer spending also declined
32-year-old brings in $39,000 a month renting his 2 boats to strangers—and only works 30 mins/day
Intel stock tumbles over 10% after brutal results
5 things to know before the stock market opens Friday