For some perspective about how outside the box that kind of performance is, keep in mind that in the second and third quarters Goldman's fixed income, currency and commodities desk took in just $3.3 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively. The equities traders took in just $312 million and $860 million.
What in God's name happened in the first quarter of this year that had Goldman raking in such outsized profits? This looks like yet another version of the greatest trade ever.
Of course, its worth asking the question the other way as well: what went wrong on the equities desk in the second quarter? Goldman's equities traders earned nearly $1.3 billion in the first quarter and $860 million in the third quarter. But in the second quarter, Goldman's stock traders earned just $312 million.
Goldman says that these traders are not operating some kind of internal hedge fund or a proprietary trading desk. They are engaged in client execution and market making. But these revenues, regardless of how Goldman wants to characterize them, are trading revenues. The fees and commissions are accounted for elsewhere.
No other source of revenue even comes close to what these bond traders make for Goldman. The closest runners up earned a fraction of what the bond traders made in the first quarter. Stock traders took in just under $1.3 billion in the first quarter. The guys running hedge funds and such for Goldman's asset management division also made just under $1.3 billion in their best quarter.
The investment bankers, by the way, topped out at just under $450 million.
Despite all the talk you'll hear about Goldman's new client friendly orientation, keep in mind that what really makes money for Goldman is trading.
Questions? Comments? Email us atNetNet@cnbc.com
Follow John on Twitter @ twitter.com/Carney
Follow NetNet on Twitter @ twitter.com/CNBCnetnet
Facebook us @ www.facebook.com/NetNetCNBC