This could be taken as good news by UBS bankers—their managers are sticking up for them, after all. But in conversations with several people at the firm, that's not the feeling I got. Instead, it has provoked feelings of fear and anger.
"Look. It feels like they want to screw us. And that we're going to get screwed," one UBS staffer told me.
In a year of near record bonuses at many firms, UBS has apparently gone the other way.
"Everyone else is trying to keep bonuses low enough that they don't piss off the regulators. UBS has it backward, trying to lowball our own people," another UBS staffer told me.
The feeling inside the bank is that the mandate for low bonus numbers has come straight from the Alps—from the Swiss bankers who control the global giant. It's viewed as a battle of the Americans against the Swiss.
"The US operation lacks leadership, dynamism. Without someone to stick up for us, we're going to get dragged down by the Alpines," a staffer said.
The bonus battle has re-ignited some bitter infighting. Back in October, the bank appointed Philip Lofts as chief executive of the Americas division; previously he'd been the chief risk officer for UBS globally. The former CEO of the Americas division, Robert Wolf, remains in the chairman position.
Some inside UBS thought the decision to put Lofts in the CEO position was a mistake. Now the latest bonus blow-up has brought up the questions of Lofts' competence once again.
Questions? Comments? Email us atNetNet@cnbc.com
Follow John on Twitter @ twitter.com/Carney
Follow NetNet on Twitter @ twitter.com/CNBCnetnet
Facebook us @ www.facebook.com/NetNetCNBC