PETER THIEL: But, then the intellectually honest thing to do would be to say that Google is no longer a technology company, that it’s basically it’s a search engine. The search technology was developed a decade ago. It’s a bet that there will be no one else who will come up with a better search technology. So, you invest in Google, because you’re betting against technological innovation in search. And it’s like a bank that generates enormous cash flows every year, but you can’t issue a dividend, because the day you take that $30 billion and send it back to people you’re admitting that you’re no longer a technology company. That’s why Microsoft can’t return its money. That’s why all these companies are building up hordes of cash, because they don’t know what to do with it, but they don’t want to admit they’re no longer tech companies.
Much the same could be said for Apple. The huge cash positions could ne seen as an indictment of management’s ability to innovate. (See: Google Earnings Beat Forecast but Revenue Is Light)
Follow John on Twitter. (Market and financial news, adventures in New York City, plus whatever is on his mind.) You can email him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can also be our friend on Facebook. Or subscribe to John's Facebook page.
Questions? Comments? Tips? Email us atNetNet@cnbc.comor send a text message to: 917-740-8477.
Call us at 201-735-4638.