Funny Business
More Videos
- In Search of America's ‘Hottest Forecasters’
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- Is America Ready for a Bacon Milkshake?
- ‘Goodnight iPad’ — A Bedtime Story for Adults
- Can't Get in on the Facebook IPO, How About a Real Gamble?
- Funny Businesses For Ex-Lovers and Office Meetings
- Super Bowl Party Food Inflation
- Facebook Vs Apple - Who'd You Rather
- The Bennie Awards: Celebrating the Worst in TV
- CSI: Miami, The Funny Years
MOST SHARED
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- Pauley Perrette's Southern Bakery a Hit in Manhattan
- Stocks at Lows, 34 Italian Banks Downgraded
- GE Holds Dividend Steady; Fourth-Quarter Hike Seen
- US Trade Deficit Swells to $48.8 Billion on China Gap
- Confusing Chinese Data Signal Bearish Trend
- Japan Minister Makes Rare Remark on Yen Intervention
- Steelers' Antonio Brown Spends Super Bowl Week with Twitter Fan Turned BFF
- Kimco Realty CEO on Solid Earnings
- Bankers in Asia Aren't as Reviled as in West: DBS CEO
- Dow vs. S&P 500: Which is a Better Investment?
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- Avis on the Road to Strong Growth: Analyst
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- LinkedIn’s Growth Is Already Priced In: Analyst
- The Real Reason Behind Bank of America’s Rally
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- This Valentine’s Day Love Is Served on a Silver Platter
- CEO to CEO: Our Roles Are Changing
- With Investors So Bullish, Stock Pullback Must Be Ahead
- Is Bill Gross, PIMCO's Bond King, Losing His Touch?
- Greece Austerity Deal Runs Into Trouble Once Again
- Why Saving Greece Could Destroy the World
- Apple’s Record Run: $500 Is a Magic Number
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- Housing Still Hurting Consumers, Economy: Bernanke
- Get Ready for $5 Gas This Year: Ex-Shell CEO
- The World's Best Beers
RSS FEED
After IndyMac, Who's Next?
Text Size 
Jane Wells is currently a CNBC business news reporter, based in Los Angeles, covering the defense and technology industries. Wells came from CNBC's “Upfront Tonight” where she was senior correspondeI’m outside IndyMac headquarters all day Monday (or should I say IndyMac Bank FSB), as every depositor in America watches to see what happens when a big bank fails and the FDIC comes in to take over. I feel like a kid again. Back in the ‘80s I was chasing Charles Keating around a federal courthouse and trying to track down then-California Senator Alan Cranston, one of the “Keating Five” (which included John McCain).
Americans want assurances that if what happened at IndyMac [IMB
Loading...
()
] happens at their bank, their money is safe and accessible--at least the federally insured amount of $100,000 per individual account ($250,000 for many 401k's). The FDIC is even promising IndyMac customers 50 cents on the dollar for uninsured deposits, with hopes to be able to pay the whole thing at some point. IndyMac depositors can even cash out their CD’s early without penalty, but the FDIC says that isn’t necessary.
Fasten your seatbelts.
Chris Thornberg at Beacon Economics says, “IndyMac was the first major institution that wasn’t too big to fail.” He says as the Feds are busy worrying about “the big boys”—Fannie and Freddie—hundreds, maybe thousands, of smaller, regional banks will now realize they have no savior. Thornberg says investors in those banks have to ask themselves, “Is this institution fundamentally safe?” Depositors with accounts insured by the FDIC don’t have to worry…unless the FDIC starts to run low on funds. That looks unlikely at the moment. It has $53 billion, and says IndyMac—by far the largest bank takeover this year—will cost it between $4 billion and $8 billion.
So who’s next? Two interesting takes on that.
Thornberg says, “We’re still early in this cycle.” He says regional banks don’t suffer the bulk of their problems until late in a credit downturn. We can expect to see home loan delinquencies to continue to spread to personal loans, car loans and student loans. He also says the next big shoe to drop is regional banks with a lot of exposure to builders, including commercial builders who are building condos or other projects that will fail. Thornberg says banks often hold onto part of the loans they give builders, in essence paying themselves and keeping the loans current. “The books aren’t even reflecting the potential problems in those loans.” But when I asked which banks in particular, he said he doesn’t want to name names. I suggested he was afraid of being the next Chuck Schumer, after regulators blamed the New York Senator for causing the run on IndyMac. “A lot of people are blaming Chuck Schumer,” Thornberg says. “All Chuck did was point out what investors should’ve known all along. IndyMac was in big, big trouble.”
Richard Bove at Ladenburg Thalmann has a different take on who may be next. In a report, he looks at all the FDIC-backed institutions, comparing each bank’s bad loans to its overall assets through two ratios. First, he divides the “non-performing assets” of an institution--bad loans, late loans, foreclosed assets--by all of its outstanding loans. “A radio above 5 percent suggests danger.” The overall industry ratio is below 2 percent. That’s good news. But it’s not so good for individual names like Downey Financial [DSL
Loading...
()
], with a 13.86 percent ratio (on Sunday, Downey Financial reported its non-performing assets were over 14 percent, up from 1 percent a year ago). Other names in the “danger zone” are Corus Bankshares [CORS
Loading...
()
] at 13.18 percent, Doral Financial [DRL
Loading...
()
] at 12.82 percent, FirstFed Financial [FED
Loading...
()
] at 6.73 percent, Oriental Financial [BFG
Loading...
()
] at 6.12 percent, and BankUnited Financial [BKUNA
Loading...
()
] at 5.36 percent.
Then Bove ran a second set of numbers dividing a bank’s non-performing assets by its reserves plus common equity. “A ratio about 40 percent is the danger zone.” This is where it gets interesting. You have all the same names as listed before, PLUS WASHINGTON MUTUAL [WM
Loading...
()
], which comes in with a ratio at 40.6 percent. Bove calls this being “on the edge” of danger but not quite there yet. (See the video for more from Bove).
Bove blames regulators for not doing much of anything to prevent us from getting to this point. “Regulators should have the courage to stand in front of a mania and stop it,” he says. “This requires a courage that simply is not in evidence in Washington either on the positive or negative side.” He’s concerned about what happens next. “All of the actions are to deepen the trend. It really is beyond inexcusable for top policymakers to argue that large financial institutions should be allowed to fail. It is, of course, just as inexcusable to look the other way while excesses are driven through the system.”
Questions? Comments? Funny Stories? Email
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
