Enter multiple symbols separated by commas

Print magazines & music CDs: Why I’m going back

When the iPad first debuted I was an eager buyer. The device was gorgeous and the opportunity incredible: access to nearly unlimited amounts of everything, all the time. Not much later I swore off print, allowing most of my physical newspaper and magazine subscriptions to lapse, pleased with the thought of so much content in the palm of my hand. Less mail. Less paper. Less recycling. Perfect!

However, perfection came with a problem: less reading.

People buy the new Apple iPad Air at the Apple Store in New York City.
Getty Images
People buy the new Apple iPad Air at the Apple Store in New York City.

At first I was mesmerized by the interactivity and access of digital publications. I still am. The multimedia aspects of ads in these formats can be cool and are impossible to replicate on paper. Who doesn't love an animated deodorant ad? Except I wasn't seeing many animated deodorant ads, or anything for that matter. Much of that amazing content was hidden away under the iPad's dark screen or inside an app. Out of sight literally became out of mind, which made it easy to forget what I was paying to read.

Then I watched my 10 year old.

Still without her own tablet or phone, she gets a few magazines in the mail. She loves it; she gets excited every time they're delivered (hand-delivered by mail). We sit and talk about what she's reading. Who knew there were so many types of lemurs? I was missing out. Tablets, amazing as they are, are solitary.

(Read more: Get ready for Craigslist: The next generation)

A few months ago I made the decision to reactivate a few of my print subscriptions. Not all of them, but most of my favorites. Soon I realized that what was sitting on the table - right in front of my face - was much more likely to be picked up and (gasp) read. The articles may not have all of the bells and whistles that the digital versions have, but at least I'm seeing the articles. My "click through" rate on print ads is approximately 100 percent.

To complete my apparent transition back to five years ago, I've also returned to buying more music on CD (that's "compact disc" for you youngsters) and even LPs (that's "long play" record for hipster newbies). As someone who actually owned the first Rio Diamond mp3 player, it feels odd to go back in time. Odd, but good. I'd forgotten how sweet the sound is. Thank you Horace Silver.

I love the flexibility of digital – streaming music around the house is fantastic. But I can do that with the music on those little silver discs. Better yet, I can stream or listen to that freed music on any darn device I want, untied to a specific ecosystem. Bonus: my kid can check out my near 30-year collection of music without scrolling down a computer screen. Why were the furs psychedelic? Which member of this group is named Pink? It's a library of the musical life that can be unboxed even after I'm put in one.

(Read more: Apple 2014—Don't call it a comeback)

Apple, listen up, because Amazon is getting it right. In another genius move, when you buy a CD, Amazon often lets you download the digital version right away. Consumers get the best of both worlds. You can feel young and old in one purchase.

The trends for print circulation, ad rates and CD sales indicate that I may well be the only one in America returning to the old way. It's a hard time to be physical in a digitally ephemeral world. Print and CD sales trends are likely to get worse before they get better, if they get better.

Follow me on Spotify if you will. It's great, especially to discover music, and I'm there. But right now I'm going to pour a glass of wine, throw in a CD and sit down with the latest issue of whatever magazine is sitting on my coffee table. And hey, spills are less costly this way. Besides, recycling day doesn't come for a week.

Contact Commentary

  • CNBC will consider commentary on a variety of topics, including investing, Wall Street, politics, international affairs, the Federal Reserve, health care, technology, careers, entertainment and more. We want a variety of viewpoints – especially those that are different from something you’ve read on CNBC.com.

    Send op-ed pitches to commentary@cnbc.com. Put the words OP-ED in the subject. Articles should be between 600 and 700 words. All submissions must be exclusive to CNBC.com. Please also include a 1-2 sentence bio of the author and a Twitter handle for the author or company. Please remember these are opinions and should be in your own voice, not in the voice of your PR person or in-house legal consultant!

    We apologize that due to the volume of submissions, we may not be able to respond to every email. If we have not responded within 5 business days, please feel free to submit the op-ed to another publication.

    Get all the latest commentary on Twitter.com @CNBCopinion.

    Who is the commentary editor?
    Cindy Perman is the commentary editor for CNBC.com. She has worked in online news for more than a decade. She also writes the "There Must be a Pony in Here Somewhere" blog and is the author of the book “New York Curiosities” (2013, 2nd edition). Follow her on Twitter @CindyPerman.