If you're looking for an affordable retirement, the city in which you decide to live should be an important factor.
Personal finance website WalletHub recently ranked 182 U.S. cities based on their affordability, activities, quality of life and health care.
Each city was graded on a 100-point scale, with 100 representing the highest score.
Here are the cities that fared best.
No. 5: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Total score: 57.83
Affordability rank: 76
Activities rank: 4
Quality of life rank: 86
Health-care rank: 48
No. 4: Denver
Total score: 58.34
Affordability rank: 114
Activities rank: 16
Quality of life rank: 35
Health-care rank: 14
No. 3: Tampa, Florida
Total score: 58.48
Affordability rank: 19
Activities rank: 21
Quality of life rank: 67
Health-care rank: 79
No. 2: Scottsdale, Arizona
Total score: 59.36
Affordability rank: 78
Activities rank: 26
Quality of life rank: 4
Health-care rank: 37
No. 1: Orlando, Florida
Total score: 60.09
Affordability rank: 7
Activities rank: 7
Quality of life rank: 130
Health-care rank: 38
Here are the worst cities for retirement:
No. 5: Stockton, California
Total score: 36.4
Affordability rank: 112
Activities rank: 179
Quality of life rank: 166
Health-care rank: 174
No. 4: Baltimore
Total score: 35.84
Affordability rank: 148
Activities rank: 66
Quality of life rank: 182
Health-care rank: 163
No. 3: Warwick, Rhode Island
Total score: 35.71
Affordability rank: 168
Activities rank: 123
Quality of life rank: 159
Health-care rank: 152
No. 2: Bridgeport, Connecticut
Total score: 34.83
Affordability rank: 181
Activities rank: 151
Quality of life rank: 133
Health-care rank: 88
No. 1: Newark, New Jersey
Total score: 33.86
Affordability rank: 174
Activities rank: 78
Quality of life rank: 172
Health-care rank: 171
This map shows how all the cities ranked, with one being the highest and 182 the lowest.