Tech Check
MOST SHARED
- Top 20 European Stocks for Crisis Time: Strategist
- Scots' Push for Britain Break-Up Begins in Earnest
- Why Are Greek and Italian Politicians So Bad?
- Both Campaigns Seize on Romney’s Years at Bain
- As Euro Meeting Fizzles Out, 2 Leaders Head Home to Tend Political Gardens
- Now Is the Time to Buy Chinese Stocks: Goldman Sachs
- Bargain Hunters and Aid Hopes Lift Europe Shares
- Australia Approves Migrant Workers for Mining Projects
- Beware Hidden Costs as Banks Eye ‘Grexit’
- Big European Funds Dump Euro Assets
- Top 20 European Stocks for Crisis Time: Strategist
- Curt Schilling's Video Game Company Goes Bust
- Time for Flash Sales to Adapt or Die
- What Flash Sites Are Suggesting About Consumers
- Hewlett-Packard Faces a ‘Dogfight’ for Talent: Analyst
- Laouchez: Leadership in Financial Services — Missing in Action?
- DuckDuckGo Cooks Google’s Goose: Analyst
- Growing Sub-Prime Auto Loans - New Troubles for Automakers?
- General Electric’s $4.5 Billion Dividend Slated for Buybacks
- Why Are Greek and Italian Politicians So Bad?
- Big European Funds Confirm Dumping Euro Assets
- ECB Official: On Greece, 'We Are Working on Plan A'
- Spain: Too Poor to Win a Singing Contest?
- China Counter-Challenges US Over Subsidies at WTO
- Is 'Equity Cult' Dead? Stocks Most Unloved in 50 Years
- Heard in More US States: See You in Tax Court!
- Scots' Push for Britain Break-Up Begins in Earnest
- Both Campaigns Seize on Romney’s Years at Bain
RSS FEED
Microsoft/EU Ruling: Consider The Consumer Too
Text Size 
Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
 |
CNBC.com |
The EU's Court of First Instance says the anti-trust commission was correct when it determined that Microsoft abused its dominant position in the software world to hold back competition in everything from operating systems to server software to media players.
Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] found today's news "disappointing."
Microsoft must now share Windows source code with competitors and offer a version of Windows without the Windows Media Player.
Of course, few consumers will actually want Windows without the media player whether they use that software or not. Which means the penalty, beyond the fine, which amounts to nothing more than a parking ticket for the company, won't do much. And worse, it may end up hurting consumers.
This statement this morning from Thomas O. Barnett, Assistant Attorney General for the U.S. Justice Department's Antitrust Division: “In light of the United States’ own antitrust case and judgment against Microsoft, and the importance of the computer industry to consumers and to the global economy, the United States has a particular interest in today’s CFI decision... We are...concerned that the standard applied to unilateral conduct by the CFI, rather than helping consumers, may have the unfortunate consequence of harming consumers by chilling innovation and discouraging competition."
He adds: “In the United States, the antitrust laws are enforced to protect consumers by protecting competition, not competitors. In the absence of demonstrable consumer harm, all companies, including dominant firms, are encouraged to compete vigorously. U.S. courts recognize the potential benefits to consumers when a company, including a dominant company, makes unilateral business decisions, for example to add features to its popular products or license its intellectual property to rivals, or to refuse to do so."
These are important considerations since the EU has made no secret that it will be going after Intel [INTC
Loading...
()
] , is mulling action against Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
] , and who knows, may end up with Apple [AAPL
Loading...
()
] in its crosshairs as well. Any company with a dominant position that aggressively seeks to protect that position could be fair game. And if the courts find fault, the remedies run the risk of punishing companies, as well as consumers as a kind of antitrust collateral damage.
Something to consider since there are so many other cases, with potentially huge ramifications for some of the biggest names in technology. I'm not saying Microsoft's behavior was unfairly punished. Quite the contrary. It's just that the courts ought to consider consumers just as much as they consider competitors when doling out decisions.
Microsoft has not decided yet whether to appeal today's ruling.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
