FEATURED SLIDESHOW
Who Is The Worst CEO?Mad Money needed new inductees for its
Wall of Shame, so we asked viewers for
nominations.
RECENT POSTS
- Lightning Round: Toyota, Ford, Colgate-Palmolive and More
- Lightning Round OT: Hudson City Bancorp, Duke Energy and More
- Is This the Next 3Com?
- John Mack: Hero of the Credit Crisis?
- Cramer: Buy This New Gold ETF
- Cramer Tackles Toll Brothers Report
- Lightning Round: Priceline.com, Citigroup, Transocean and More
- Lightning Round OT: STEC, ICICI Bank and More
- Herbalife Vs. Hedge Funds
- Cramer Jeers J&J, Applauds Abbott


Cramer thinks Starbucks is a sell no matter what some analyst says.
Back on Nov. 20, Friedman Billings Ramsey upgraded Starbucks [SBUX
Loading...
()
] to “outperform,” or “buy” in Wall Street gibberish. But the reasons it gave for the recommendation sounded more like reasons to sell, as far as Cramer was concerned.
High commodity costs, concept maturity (the fact that Starbucks is getting old) and a lack of organic growth leave the coffee retailer with no choice but to radically change management or invite a takeover. FBR recommended the stock on the likelihood that those two things could happen.
If that’s the best case for recommending a stock, then the case shouldn’t be made, Cramer said. He preferred CIBC’s analysis, which downgraded Starbucks the same day FBR upgraded it. The bottom line for CIBC was that SBUX just isn’t a high-growth stock anymore. Management isn’t going a great job dealing with the business’ maturity, new stores are cannibalizing old ones, and McDonald’s [MCD
Loading...
()
] new coffee initiative is a real threat to Starbucks’ dominance.
Starbucks’ stock is down 40% over the past year, and Cramer expects it will continue to decline, especially if the company keeps lowering guidance as it did for the first quarter of 2008. SBUX should not be owned, he said, until it drops below $16.
Jim's charitable trust owns McDonald's.
Questions for Cramer?
Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website?



