- Retail Earnings and Sales to Improve in Q4: Analyst
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- It's Beginning To Look A Lot More Riskless
- Crescenzi: Claims Level Suggests End to Job Losses
- Hedge Funds Take Early Lead in Warren Buffett's 'Big Bet'
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- 4 Food Stocks to Stuff in Your Portfolio: Analyst
- S&P at 1050-1200 Trading Range Next Year: Strategist
- Treasury On Mortgage Modifications
- For Many in US, It Will Be a Scaled-Down Holiday Season
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Foreign Demand Boosts US 7-Year Treasury Sale
- Google CEO Schmidt Makes Secret Visit to Iraq
- New-Home Sales Jump to Highest Level in Over Year
- Consumers Catching the Holiday Spirit
- Jobless Claims Below 500,000, Durable Orders Slip
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
MOST SHARED
- Ritz-Carlton ?Struggling? in the US: President
- Garlic Price Rises Surpass Gold, Stocks in China
- New-Home Sales Jump 6.2% To Highest Level in Over Year
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Half of Banks' Losses May Still Be Hidden: IMF Head
- Oil Price to Average $75.40 in 2010: Poll
- Americans Ditch Planes for Trains this Thanksgiving
- Jobless Claims Below 500,000, Durable Orders Slip
- Consumer Mood Improves, But Anxiety Over Personal Finances
- A Facebook Christmas
Text Size 
 |
AP |
It means least-common-denominator solutions--or half-solutions--to whatever problem is on the table at the time.
That's what's happening on Pennsylvania Avenue in the alternative minimum tax debate. Both sides agree that roughly 20-million Americans who are not super-rich should be spared an AMT hit on their 2007 tax bills.
Democrats want to "pay for" the $51-billion cost of doing that by raising taxes on hedge fund managers in the name of "fiscal responsibility"; Republicans oppose that step in the name of "no new taxes." Since resolving that disagreement is to hard, the "pay for" issue will eventually be shelved and the cost of an AMT fix will simply go onto the nation's pile of debt.
It's also happening on energy legislation. With the public increasingly anxious about America's dependence on foreign oil, lawmakers in both parties have seized on higher vehicle fuel efficiency as a key step. The Democratic majority in Congress has seized on two others -- raising taxes on oil companies to help finance development of new energy sources, and requiring utilities to derive a fixed percentage of their energy from renewable sources.
Republicans have opposed the latter two steps in the name of "no new taxes" (see above) and no unreasonable mandates. Lacking the votes to overcome a Republican filibuster or presidential veto, Democrats are likely to cave in and pass the higher fuel standards.
That's another least common denominator solution--the best Washington is capable of at the moment.
Questions? Comments? Write to .
- For nearly three decades, these on-call experts have been dishing advice on how to – and not to – cook turkey.
- Eric Schmidt pledges to create a virtual copy of the Iraq National Museum at Google’s expense.
- Bill Griffeth is taking a leave of absence from CNBC and Power Lunch for a year. Here's a message from Bill.
- More shoppers than ever plan to comparison-shop this season. Who will benefit?
- It may be the most unusual guide to business you'll read.
- How can you get out of debt and back on the road to recovery? Follow these ten steps.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes