Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Bank-owned Inventory: Move it!
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
- Mortgage Bankers Slash 2009 Forecasts
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Investing in Tech Now
- Apartment Vacancy Rate Hits 22-Year High
- What You'll See On My NASCAR Documentary Tonight
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- Warren Buffett: Economy Needs Another Dose of Viagra
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon-Trading
- Citigroup Replaces CFO, Shakes Up Top Management
- New Jobless Claims Plunge; Continuing Claims Hit Record
- Cramer?s Outrage
- Mortgage Rates Slide to Six-Week Low
- Warren Buffett Tells CNBC Consumer Sales Remain "Very, Very Soft"
- July 10th in Market History
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Options Smell 'Blood' on Infosys
- Christmas in July: Consumers To Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- GM's Second Chance
- Art Cashin: Traders Weigh Obama Policy Changes
- Warren Buffett: Economy Needs Another Dose of Viagra
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Chevron Says Q2 Hit by US Refining, Weak Dollar
- Stimulus Critics Put Obama, Democrats on Defensive
- Warren Buffett: Consumer Sales Remain 'Very, Very Soft'
- Don’t Get Burned By Hot Emerging Markets
- Busch: Chinese Bank Announces Bombshell
- Lenny Dykstra: 'Bank Fraud' Led to Bankruptcy
- Cramer: What to Expect This Earnings Season
- Christmas in July: Consumers to Out-Scrooge Scrooge
- Software Giants Rush to Cash In on Carbon-Trading
RSS FEED

![]() |
CNBC.com |
According to the Realtors: The index is based on a large national sample, typically representing about 20 percent of transactions for existing-home sales. In developing the model for the index, it was demonstrated that the level of monthly sales-contract activity from 2001 through 2004 parallels the level of closed existing-home sales in the following two months.
An index of 100 is equal to the average level of contract activity during 2001, which was the first year to be examined as well as the first of five consecutive record years for existing-home sales.
So given that, it’s not surprising that the index is prone to corrections, as we saw today. The October number was revised from 87.2 to 89.9. The September number was also revised up.
I write all this because seconds after I reported these numbers, we went to colleague Rick Santelli at the Chicago Board of Trade to see reaction, and my question is: Should the markets really be moving on this particular index? It’s not a real sales number but a percentage move on an index number that was invented by the Realtors based on sales in 2001.
Rick said interest rates were moving on this number, especially on the revision. Now I know that these days everyone is looking for any tiny little data point that will give them some inkling as to where the housing market is going.
But housing is a behemoth that moves slowly and methodically, and one predictive number that doesn't gauge actual sales, shouldn't be taken as a snapshot of where exactly the housing market is going.
Questions? Comments?











