- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Microsoft Plays a Game of Bing Pong
- Klutzy Woz Becomes Auto Body Pitchman
- Google Goes After Microsoft, Kind Of
- Flip Backfires on Cisco's John Chambers
- TeleMedicine Gets An Apple App Store Facelift
- iPhone Gets Big Stamp of Approval
- Jobs Returns, But Who's Running the Show?
- Jackson Juices Yahoo's Traffic
- Jackson, Inc. Becoming An Online Boom
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- Dykstra Discusses Bankruptcy
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED

![]() |
I know Google's [GOOG
Loading...
()
] got a cute name, and it's got a quirky style of doing business, but whining about predatory Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] becoming all-too-powerful and another antitrust threat if its snaps up Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
] -- when Google itself has been called the Microsoft of the internet -- rings a little hollow for me.
Google will try to paint this as a "David vs. Goliath" showdown. Make no mistake, this is far more like Goliath vs. Goliath instead.
I'm surprised Google issued a statement at all, let alone something that harps on Microsoft for trying to become too powerful in the nascent world of online advertising.
Drummond writes that Microsoft's hostile bid for Yahoo! "raises troubling questions...It's about preserving the underlying principles of the internet: Openness and innovation.
"Could Microsoft now attempt to exert the same sort of inappropriate and illegal influence over the internet that it did with the PC? While the internet rewards competitive innovation, Microsoft has frequently sought to establish proprietary monopolies -- and then leverage its dominance into new, adjacent markets."
It's an interesting question and an important, troubling issue. But isn't that precisely what Google is trying to do? It owns the online search business. It acquired DoubleClick so it could stake its claim in display advertising and hopefully own that some day.
Google unveiled the mobile software platform Android and is a bidder in the FCC spread spectrum wireless auction so it can some day own the wireless world. It's offering free spreadsheet software online and free email. Google started with one business, owns it, and is trying to leverage that ownership to a slew of new businesses. For Google, that's a strategy that makes sense. But when Microsoft tries to employ the same approach, it becomes the Evil Empire again.
Microsoft hosted its strategic update this morning in New York City: news nuggets coming from the meeting include Microsoft's hope that its deal for Yahoo could close by year-end; that the $1 billion in synergies could be realized by the end of the first year of a combined company; and that despite a massive cash position, Microsoft might seek financing for the cash portion of the deal.
But it was when Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer was asked about the brewing antitrust feud with Google that things got interesting.
Says Ballmer: "From a regulatory perspective, we think the combination of Microsoft/Yahoo actually makes a more competitive marketplace by establishing a strong number 2 competitor, and any alternative scenario actually doesn't seem to enhance competition and that certainly that would be the message we'll communicate to regulators.
"I mean, Google's clearly got a dominant position. They have about 75 percent Paid Search worldwide; we think this enhances competition. Anything else would be less good from that perspective."
Top marks for Google for playing the antitrust card, but after more than a year of speculation about a deal brewing between Yahoo and Microsoft, you'd think Google could come up with something better; or a little more creative. Heck, Microsoft is trying its best to play the "underdog" card and that too rings a little hollow for me. But that doesn't make the battle any less entertaining to watch, or lessen the stakes for consumers caught in the middle. In fact, it makes it more so.
In this heavyweight web event, if competition is key, Round 1 goes to Microsoft. Let's see what Google, and regulators, come back with next.
Questions? Comments?







