- New York Fashion Week Hits the Runway as Colors Pop
- Mulling Buffett's Stock Advice? Get in With REITs: Fund Managers
- LinkedIn Earnings Bode Well for Hiring and Social Media
- Top Five Mistakes to Avoid in Online Dating
- Victor Cruz ‘Understands’ Gisele's Super Bowl Frustrations
- Tamminen: The United States of India
- Unusual Volume: Taleo Jumps After Oracle's $1.9 Billion Offer
- Warren Buffett: Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds .. and They're Safer 'By Far'
- So Now You Can’t Give Microsoft Away?
- Stocks Looking Past Europe for a New Driver of the Rally
- Citigroup Takes $50 Million Loss in Lending Rate Probe
- In Europe, Stagnation as a Way of Life
- Oil Demand to Grow With 'Two Speed Outlook: IEA
- The Secret Lives of Traders—Seeking the Next Hot Thing
- FBI Investigated Steve Jobs Drug Use

- Strip Greenspan of His Knighthood: SocGen Strategist
- China Imports Slump, Raising Demand Concerns
- Get All the Latest Out of Europe Here
This blog will look at the winners and losers in the retail space. Who has the right strategy to capture consumer dollars? It also will look for trends in consumer spending and how that will impact the economy.
Gucci "Loves" New York, But City Not Returning Sentiment
CNBC Reporter
![]() |
Why? The ESDC is the economic development arm for the State of New York and it owns the trademark to the marketing campaign ''I (love as symbolized by a heart) New York.' They did not give Gucci permission to use the slogan. Gucci's CEO already met with the agency and negotiations are continuing this week. Take a look at the Gucci campaign here.
Gucci designed around 600 of the bags to commemorate the opening of its 46,000 square foot NY flagship. The proceeds from all sales will go to the Playground Partners Central Park Improvement Program. In other words, Gucci [owned by PPR which trades in France] doesn't financially benefit from the design itself. They do hope that the NY-store exclusive would help drive traffic to the new flagship.
Here's what I find strange: (1) a NYC agency is supposedly challenging the sale of a bag whose financial proceeds benefit the city itself and (2) the agency markets tourism and commerce in the city yet doesn't want a luxury brand to promote the image of a chic-trendy New York.
The point of dispute is that Gucci did not give ESDC a cut of the proceeds and that the agency was not given a head's up about the luxury company's intention to reference the trademark. It seems to me that this is either a case of overeager litigation or plain shortsightedness. The ESDC owns the trademark and sells it to 47 different licensees.
The kitchyness of the Gucci design is that a common slogan (referencing one printed on plastic grocery bags and t-shirts) and that it is embossed on a luxury bag that costs hundreds and sometimes thousands of dollars. That said, the chic marketing tactic is a win-win for marketing of the city and marketing of the company. We'll keep you posted on how the dispute plays out.
Do you think that the ESDC has a case against Gucci? Take the poll and write to me what you think.
On a separate note, a second market for the limited edition bags has now sprouted up online. The bags were given out in gift bags at the launch party on Wednesday and then were put on sale last Friday when the store officially opened. Will the resale market add another element of complication to the case? After all, the resellers are the ones making money off the bags. Gucci never did! Check out ebay's collection.
Questions? Comments?
- Many have called to abolish the Federal Reserve. But what would happen if it was dissolved for good?
- Entrepreneurs have increasingly been buying back their companies over the last three years.
- Where are the best city locations for singles to take the online dating plunge?
- A Steelers fan spent a week with wide receiver Antonio Brown- and it was all due to tweeting.
- Here’s a look at the woman behind the newest collectible toy that kids love.
- Grab a brew—or not—and click ahead to experience the world’s most highly rated beers.













