Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES
 

  Current Housing Indicators
CURRENTPREVIOUS
Existing Home Sales4.91m5.02m
New Home Sales460,000520,000
Housing Starts817,000872,000
Building Permits786,000857,000
HMI1417
Existing Home Prices$203,100▼ (annually)$224,400
New Home Prices$221,900▼ (annually)$236,500
 
Realty Check Video Gallery
Commercial mortgages are under fire, with CNBC's Diana Olick; Darrell Wheeler, Citigroup CMBS analyst; and CNBC's Steve ...
The commercial real estate market has been slammed over the past few days, with CNBC's Diana Olick.
 
HOMEBUILDERS TOP 10 INDEX
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
See all Realty Check PostsRealty Check with Diana Olick
Text Size
Feb.21
11:40 AM ET
Thursday, 21 Feb 2008
Re-listing: I Think It's Cheating--What Do You Think?

For Sale Signs
AP

There’s been a lot of talk in the blogosphere lately about the phenomenon of “re-listing”, and so it behooves me to weigh in. “Re-listing” is when an agent takes a property that’s been sitting on the market a bit longer than one might like and removes it from the market, only to “re-list” it days or even minutes later as a “fresh” listing.

As homes sit on the market longer and longer these days, it’s a tactic that many real estate agents say is legal, helpful, and really a no-brainer.

The problem is that despite all the news of the housing downturn, for some reason buyers still like to see “days on market” under 30 before they’re willing to step in. Anything above that is a turn-off. There are ways to find out, if you know where to dig, what the total days on-market has been, but the average real e-surfer probably doesn’t know how.

I sent an email over to the National Association of Realtors to see what the “official” position there is and got a prompt response from Walter Moloney in the public affairs office:

"NAR doesn't have a policy on relisting.

However, the fact that a home has been relisted is something most agents with full MLS access can readily see. That information should be readily available to clients, e.g., working with a buyer's agent."

I called a few agents, none of whom would let me use their names, but the consensus is that yes it happens, yes it fuzzies up the math, and no they don’t consider it cheating because it’s legal.

I beg to differ. Here’s my opinion (which I’m allowed to give here on the blog because it’s a blog, not my other job as a business journalist on CNBC): That’s rot. It is cheating. It’s one thing to change the perception of a home by staging it, dressing it up a bit, but fudging the numbers of “days on market” is just as bad as leaving out the fact that the basement floods periodically. There’s a reason that number is there, so people can gauge interest and understand if that home is correctly priced compared to its neighborhood comps.

I’d love to hear what you think. Take the poll and write into the blog and we’ll post some opinions this afternoon.

Questions?  Comments? 

© 2008 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Permalink: /id/23275875

HOME  |  NEWS  |  MARKETS  |  EARNINGS  |  INVESTING  |  VIDEO  |  CNBC TV  |  CNBC PLUS  |  CNBC MOBILE  |  CNBC HD+
About CNBC   |   Site Map   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service   |   Advertise   |   Help   |   Feedback   |   Video Reprints
  Data is a real-time snapshot   *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes

Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis