Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.91m | ▼ | 5.02m |
| New Home Sales | 460,000 | ▼ | 520,000 |
| Housing Starts | 817,000 | ▼ | 872,000 |
| Building Permits | 786,000 | ▼ | 857,000 |
| HMI | 14 | ▼ | 17 |
| Existing Home Prices | $203,100 | ▼ (annually) | $224,400 |
| New Home Prices | $221,900 | ▼ (annually) | $236,500 |
- Fear Gripping Commercial Real Estate—But Question Is Why?
- Reasons NOT To Modify Troubled Home Loans
- Bailout For Builders—Are They Next In Line?
- Homeowners: Not Just About Buying—It's Also About Investing
- Bailout Anger Boiling: "Is Kashkari A Chump?"
- That $300 Billion Hope For Homeowners Isn’t Working
- Frank Vs. Paulson: Just Who Has It Right On Mortgage Defaults?
- Citi Jumps On Mortgage Modify Bandwagon: Does It Really Help?
- Fannie Mae's Future Looks Pretty Grim—Downright Scary
- Home Loans: The Case For And Against Modifying Them In Court
- Out with Cox, in with Uptick Rule
- Pops & Drops: Hewlett-Packard, JP Morgan & Air Wagoner
- Mad Money Green Week: Owens Corning
- Fast & Furious: It's All About Soup
- Web Extra: The Trade on Walmart and RIMM
- Chartology: Grossly Oversold and Favoring the Upside
- The "Armageddon" Gameplan
- What's Next for Citigroup?
- What to Expect From a Geithner-led Treasury
- Soros: More Money Needed For U.S. Bailout
- HP Earnings: How Much Will "Hurt" From Economy?
- Obama Warns On Economy: Works On Stimulus Plan
- Citigroup's Ills May Signal Market Isn't Near Bottom
- US Inflation Bonds Hit by Deflation, May Recover
- Pros Say: Market Will Drop 5-10% — Ford Will Boom
- Bonds Drop on Profit-Taking, Geithner Move
- Jack Welch on Detroit: Let Them Go Bankrupt
- Bank Shareholders Face 'the Unthinkable': El-Erian

![]() |
AP |
As homes sit on the market longer and longer these days, it’s a tactic that many real estate agents say is legal, helpful, and really a no-brainer.
The problem is that despite all the news of the housing downturn, for some reason buyers still like to see “days on market” under 30 before they’re willing to step in. Anything above that is a turn-off. There are ways to find out, if you know where to dig, what the total days on-market has been, but the average real e-surfer probably doesn’t know how.
I sent an email over to the National Association of Realtors to see what the “official” position there is and got a prompt response from Walter Moloney in the public affairs office:
"NAR doesn't have a policy on relisting.
However, the fact that a home has been relisted is something most agents with full MLS access can readily see. That information should be readily available to clients, e.g., working with a buyer's agent."
I called a few agents, none of whom would let me use their names, but the consensus is that yes it happens, yes it fuzzies up the math, and no they don’t consider it cheating because it’s legal.
I beg to differ. Here’s my opinion (which I’m allowed to give here on the blog because it’s a blog, not my other job as a business journalist on CNBC): That’s rot. It is cheating. It’s one thing to change the perception of a home by staging it, dressing it up a bit, but fudging the numbers of “days on market” is just as bad as leaving out the fact that the basement floods periodically. There’s a reason that number is there, so people can gauge interest and understand if that home is correctly priced compared to its neighborhood comps.
I’d love to hear what you think. Take the poll and write into the blog and we’ll post some opinions this afternoon.
Questions? Comments?



