More Videos
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Blog You!!!
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- 'Bruno' Fashions Top Spot at US Box Office
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
RSS FEED
Text Size 
 |
Up until last month, AMGN [AMGN
Loading...
()
] had been atop the list of pharmaceutical manufacturer donors and PFE [PFE
Loading...
()
] was in a close second. But the CRP says they flip-flopped in the most recent month that figures are available. So far, in the 2008 election cycle, Pfizer's given $862,000 to candidates and Amgen has forked over $852,000.
And the two companies have different preferences. PFE has donated 52 percent of its cash to Democrats, 48 percent to Republicans. While AMGN has put 49 percent on Dems and 51 percent on the GOP. GlaxoSmithKline [GSK
Loading...
()
] is a distant third with $661,000 in political contributions, thus far.
Based on Federal Election Commission data released on April 28th the drugmakers, overall, have split their money evenly between the two parties. That is in stark contrast to recent election cycles.
In 2006, pharma gave 28 percent to Democrats, 70 percent to Republicans. In the last presidential election year it was 30/70 respectively. And the one before that 23/77. Even with all of their industry investigations and anti-pharmaceutical lobbying/influence rhetoric, Democrats are grabbing more cash from the companies.
Sen. Barack Obama is still number one. He has taken in $636,000 from the "pharmaceuticals/health products" sector.
Sen. Hillary Clinton is in second place with $568,000. And Sen. John McCain has moved up into fifth place (among current and former presidential candidates) at $173,000.
The financial ledger of the campaigns isn't the only place where drugs and politics are mixing it up. In his weekly piece in the Sunday New York Times, Op-Ed page columnist Frank Rich called out Congressional Republicans for coming up with what he called the "Obamaesque" tagline, "The Change You Deserve." What's the problem with that? It was a tagline for Wyeth's [WYE
Loading...
()
] antidepressant Effexor. Oops.
By the way, the CRP website which puts a ton of information at your fingertips, has also received a nice facelift.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes