More Videos
- Readers Get Short With Me--Over Amgen
- Biopharma Analyst Musical Chairs
- Abbott, Boston Scientific Stents & Stuff
- A "Short" Story On Amgen
- Merck Muscles In On Migraines
- Boston Scientific: Hurry To The Pre-4th of July Sale On Stents!?
- Credit Suisse Healthier 15: Investors Get Skinny On Fat Fighters
- FDA Delivers One-Two Punch To Merck & Lilly
- Lilly's Effient Empire
- Pfizer and the State of Statins
- Bowyer: Back to Monarchy in Land Rights?
- Parking Cash in European Telecoms
- Bargain Stocks: Nokia, Spectra, Incitex Pivot
- Sticker Shock: Fast Money's Inflation Special
- Our Favorite Inflation Trades
- Warren Buffett's Annual Stock Gift to Gates Foundation Worth $1.8B This Year
- That '70's Trade
- The Villain Of Our Story
- The Blame Game
- EU Opens Probe in BHP Billiton Bid for Rio Tinto
- Worse Car Sales Decline Expected in Western Europe
- Euro Banks Need to Raise $90-$140 Billion: Goldman
- BSkyB Mulls $4 Billion Bid for Spain's Digital Plus: FT
- On the Bright Side, Shopping Bargains Abound
- Euro Stocks Fall as Goldman Note Hits Banks
- Return of Asian Currency Crisis Is Unlikely: ADB
- European Shares Set to Open Flat as Holiday Shuts US
- Airbus to Sell Five A380s to Japan's ANA: Nikkei
 |
Amgen |
Up until last month, AMGN [AMGN
Loading...
()
] had been atop the list of pharmaceutical manufacturer donors and PFE [PFE
Loading...
()
] was in a close second. But the CRP says they flip-flopped in the most recent month that figures are available. So far, in the 2008 election cycle, Pfizer's given $862,000 to candidates and Amgen has forked over $852,000.
And the two companies have different preferences. PFE has donated 52 percent of its cash to Democrats, 48 percent to Republicans. While AMGN has put 49 percent on Dems and 51 percent on the GOP. GlaxoSmithKline [GSK
Loading...
()
] is a distant third with $661,000 in political contributions, thus far.
Based on Federal Election Commission data released on April 28th the drugmakers, overall, have split their money evenly between the two parties. That is in stark contrast to recent election cycles.
related content |
In 2006, pharma gave 28 percent to Democrats, 70 percent to Republicans. In the last presidential election year it was 30/70 respectively. And the one before that 23/77. Even with all of their industry investigations and anti-pharmaceutical lobbying/influence rhetoric, Democrats are grabbing more cash from the companies.
Sen. Barack Obama is still number one. He has taken in $636,000 from the "pharmaceuticals/health products" sector.
Sen. Hillary Clinton is in second place with $568,000. And Sen. John McCain has moved up into fifth place (among current and former presidential candidates) at $173,000.
The financial ledger of the campaigns isn't the only place where drugs and politics are mixing it up. In his weekly piece in the Sunday New York Times, Op-Ed page columnist Frank Rich called out Congressional Republicans for coming up with what he called the "Obamaesque" tagline, "The Change You Deserve." What's the problem with that? It was a tagline for Wyeth's [WYE
Loading...
()
] antidepressant Effexor. Oops.
By the way, the CRP website which puts a ton of information at your fingertips, has also received a nice facelift.
Questions? Comments?
Del.icio.us
Digg It
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes