More Videos
- GM And Why It's Tough To Kill A Brand Name
- GM's Troubles: What Brands Should It Sell To Stay "Alive"?
- GM Going Bankrupt? I Don't Buy It And Here's Why
- Chrysler's Decline: Will It Fall Behind Nissan?
- GM Proves It Still Has Some "Drive" When It Comes To Sales
- Stand Behind GM? Here's What You Have To Say
- Are You Giving Up On GM? I Want To Know Why
- GM Or Toyota As Number One: Does It Really Matter?
- Your Rants On GM, Energy Prices, And Me
- New Survey: You're Ticked Off About Lack Of Energy Policy
- Lightning Round: Energy, Big Media and Farm Equipment
- Financial Collapse: Banks Going Quietly Into the Night?
- Cramer: Fashionably Healthy
- Tuesday's Web Extra
- Fast & Furious: Oil, Nascar, Ruby Tuesday...
- Fast Message - We Answer Your Questions
- Best Of Breed: King Of Your Castle
- Pops & Drops: RIMM, Office Depot...
- The Real Green Trades
- Markets Recover; Miners Up After Alcoa Earns
- WPP Makes Hostile $2.1 Billion TNS Takeover Bid
- Macau's SJM Delays IPO Debut Amid Legal Challenge
- European Shares Set to Join Global Bounce
- South Korea to Ease FX Borrowing in Fresh Flip-Flop
- Australia Consumer Confidence Hits 16-Year Low
- LG Display Slides Ahead of Earnings, Outlook Dims
- Japan Machinery Orders Stronger than Expected
- Australia's IAG to Scale Back UK Operations
 |
CNBC.com |
I ask it because of an article in the Detroit News about Ford [F
Loading...
()
] considering a plan to revamp its pick-up line to include a smaller version of the F-150 and a next generation small pick-up to replace the Ranger. The move would be in response to gas prices that are expected to stay high.
Personally, I think it's a smart move for two reasons.
First, I think the booming middle classes in China and India will drive greater demand for gas in the years to come. So don't expect gas prices to fall back substantially anytime soon. Second, the pick-up has evolved into a supersized beast leaving a lot of people with the same bloated feeling you get after downing a super big gulp. Bigger is not always better.
Yes, I realize that the Big 3 have been in an arms race of sorts to top each other with a pick-up that delivers more capacity, more options for workers, more luxury, and a lot more room.
On one hand, it makes sense. These are moving offices for many people and they need a truck that can do it all. But on the other hand, pick-ups have evolved to the point where I half expect the next generation to look like one of those monster trucks that smash cars like pop cans.
Ford has been forced into pursuing this smaller, lighter, more fuel efficient truck line because it has to do something with gas running higher and higher. But, it's not alone. GM [GM
Loading...
()
] and Chrysler are likely doing the same. If they aren't, somebody oughtta check if the folks at those firms are living under a rock. This is one time where less may be more.
Questions? Comments?
Del.icio.us
Digg It
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes