More Videos
- Bankruptcy Supporters Make Another Stand on Capitol Hill
- UAW Concessions: Just How Much Will They Give Up?
- Automakers Want $34 Billion, What Do We Get?
- D-Day For Big 3: Will They "Land" Congress With New Plans?
- Volvo Sale Would Signal Big Changes For Big 3
- Predictions: 9 For '09 In Autos
- Big Three Ready For Show And Tell Time?
- In A Crippled Auto Industry, Reasons To Give Thanks
- Car Buyers: Do You Have Any Loyalty To Big 3?
- Ford CEO Mulally: We're In Better Shape Than GM, Chrysler
- Yoshikami: Investing & the Obama Presidency
- Wall of Shame: Fortress Investment's Wes Edens
- Cramer to Geithner: Let FDIC Chair Keep Her Job
- Lightning Round: Boeing, Medtronic, Agrium and More
- Lightning Round OT: Continental, Amylin Pharma and More
- Sell Block: Cramer's Solution for Mortgage-Backed Paper Mess
- Toll Brothers CEO's Housing Outlook
- Making Money Off M&A
- Your First Move For Friday December 5th
- Citigroup Sells German Arm for $6.7 Billion
- Charts Predict S&P Festive Rally Above 1,000
- BMW's Global Sales Plunge by a Quarter in Nov.
- Pros Say: Job Losses of 425,000; S&P to Fall to 700
- Bleak Jobs Data Forecasts Add to Automakers' Woes
- Euro Stocks Fall Ahead of US Jobs Data
- European Stocks to Open Sharply Lower
- Toshiba to Briefly Halt Chip Output on Weak Demand
- Boeing Mulls Pushing Back Dreamliner Deliveries
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
It's a major achievement Chrysler should rightfully be proud of. But it also highlights the next challenge for them, as well as GM and Ford: closing the "perception gap."
First, here's the good news for the Big 3 on assembly plant efficiency.
The Harbour Report, long considered the bible for automakers cutting costs and making vehicles more efficiently, shows Chrysler and Toyota [TM
Loading...
()
] both take 30.37 hours to build a vehicle in the U.S. That's the shortest time in the industry. GM [GM
Loading...
()
] (32.29 hours) and Ford [F
Loading...
()
] (33.88) also improved. This number is important because the fewer hours to build a vehicle, the lower the costs.
Credit the execs in Detroit and the UAW for making these improvements. After years of reports about the union workers being the problem with the decline of the Big 3, those workers deserve credit for working to make their company's more efficient.
While the Harbour Report shows improvement for Detroit, it also highlights how far the Big 3 need to go to improve profitability. Nissan [NSANY
Loading...
()
] and Honda [HMC
Loading...
()
] make $1,641 per vehicle. Toyota takes in $922. But Chrysler (-$412), GM (-$729) and Ford (-$1,467) all lose money per model. That speaks to Detroit's inability to improve pricing on cars and trucks and ultimately that highlights the Big 3's next challenge of closing the perception gap.
This has been and will continue to be a tough issue to resolve. While Detroit's building better designed and quality cars and trucks, the public is slow to change it's attitude about a Chevy, Ford or Chrysler. Too often, people still view domestic models as being cheap and poorly built even though many models are every bit as good, if not better, than the competition. Take the Chevy Malibu or Ford Edge. Both models show Detroit can build winners people want to drive.
This is how the perception gap will be narrowed. Doing it one model at a time. If the U.S. automakers can follow up with more well designed and well made models they will catch their Asian rivals in the mind of the buyer, just as Chrysler has now done in assembly plant efficiency.
Questions? Comments?
Del.icio.us
Digg It
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes