Skip navigation
MOST POPULAR RELATED TAGS
  • TOPICS
  • SECTORS
  • COMPANIES
 
 
Behind the Wheel Video Gallery
BMW has been chosen as the official automotive partner of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympics games. Ian Robertson, ...
CNBC's Steve Liesman and Larry Lindsey, of the Lindsey Group, share their economic insight.
LEBEAU'S AUTO INDEX
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

BEHIND THE WHEEL VIDEO

» More

Current DateTime: 06:55:48 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30830730
Expiration DateTime: 11/23/2009 6:57:30 AM

RSS FEED

» Help

Current DateTime: 06:55:49 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 30830722
powered by digg

Behind The Wheel

Text Size
Jun.05
9:51 AM ET

CNBC.com

They finally did it! After years of trailing the Asian automakers when it comes to assembly plant efficiency, one of the Big 3 has finally caught Toyota.

It's a major achievement Chrysler should rightfully be proud of. But it also highlights the next challenge for them, as well as GM and Ford: closing the "perception gap."

First, here's the good news for the Big 3 on assembly plant efficiency.

The Harbour Report, long considered the bible for automakers cutting costs and making vehicles more efficiently, shows Chrysler and Toyota [TM  Loading...      ()   ]  both take 30.37 hours to build a vehicle in the U.S. That's the shortest time in the industry. GM [GM  Loading...      ()   ] (32.29 hours) and Ford [F  Loading...      ()   ] (33.88) also improved. This number is important because the fewer hours to build a vehicle, the lower the costs.

Credit the execs in Detroit and the UAW for making these improvements. After years of reports about the union workers being the problem with the decline of the Big 3, those workers deserve credit for working to make their company's more efficient.

While the Harbour Report shows improvement for Detroit, it also highlights how far the Big 3 need to go to improve profitability. Nissan [NSANY  Loading...      ()   ] and Honda [HMC  Loading...      ()   ] make $1,641 per vehicle. Toyota takes in $922. But Chrysler (-$412), GM (-$729) and Ford (-$1,467) all lose money per model. That speaks to Detroit's inability to improve pricing on cars and trucks and ultimately that highlights the Big 3's next challenge of closing the perception gap.

This has been and will continue to be a tough issue to resolve. While Detroit's building better designed and quality cars and trucks, the public is slow to change it's attitude about a Chevy, Ford or Chrysler. Too often, people still view domestic models as being cheap and poorly built even though many models are every bit as good, if not better, than the competition. Take the Chevy Malibu or Ford Edge. Both models show Detroit can build winners people want to drive.

This is how the perception gap will be narrowed. Doing it one model at a time. If the U.S. automakers can follow up with more well designed and well made models they will catch their Asian rivals in the mind of the buyer, just as Chrysler has now done in assembly plant efficiency.

Questions?  Comments? 

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Tools:
PrintEmailAdd This share icon
Next Post
  • digg share
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 06:27:23 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 06:27:23 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 06:27:23 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 06:27:23 23 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters