More Videos
- Volt Drive: Great Ride, Interesting Interior and a Friendly Chirp
- Volvo Talks Show New Day Dawning for China
- Starting Car2Go - Smart Move for Daimler
- GM Cuts Losses—Plans Early Loan Repayment
- Ghosn's Bet: 10% of World Will Drive EV's in 10 Years
- Ford, Hyundai, Audi Gaining Interest
- Cadillac Converj Smart Extension of Volt
- Chrysler Makes Smart Call Staying Unplugged—For Now
- China Growth Shows GM Good Fortune
- Inflatable Seat Belts Aimed At Second Row Safety
- Farrell: Obama Hectored, Ignored and Restricted?
- Don't Dwell on Investment Mistakes; Move on, Like Buffett
- CNBC VIDEO: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' at Columbia University
- U.S. Stocks Slip, Dollar Rises
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- US Job Losses to Bottom out Next Quarter: NABE
- Late Payments on Credit Cards Drop in Third Quarter
- Smallest US Businesses Borrowing Again: PayNet
- Stocks Face 20% Correction if Rally Cracks: Strategist
- Little Sign of Inflation on the Horizon: IMF
- Kraft Weighs Higher Cadbury Bid as Rivals Circle
- MBS Program Should be Extended: Fed's Bullard
- Tyson Food Profit Beats Estimates
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
RSS FEED
Behind The Wheel
Text Size 
 |
CNBC.com |
It's a major achievement Chrysler should rightfully be proud of. But it also highlights the next challenge for them, as well as GM and Ford: closing the "perception gap."
First, here's the good news for the Big 3 on assembly plant efficiency.
The Harbour Report, long considered the bible for automakers cutting costs and making vehicles more efficiently, shows Chrysler and Toyota [TM
Loading...
()
] both take 30.37 hours to build a vehicle in the U.S. That's the shortest time in the industry. GM [GM
Loading...
()
] (32.29 hours) and Ford [F
Loading...
()
] (33.88) also improved. This number is important because the fewer hours to build a vehicle, the lower the costs.
Credit the execs in Detroit and the UAW for making these improvements. After years of reports about the union workers being the problem with the decline of the Big 3, those workers deserve credit for working to make their company's more efficient.
While the Harbour Report shows improvement for Detroit, it also highlights how far the Big 3 need to go to improve profitability. Nissan [NSANY
Loading...
()
] and Honda [HMC
Loading...
()
] make $1,641 per vehicle. Toyota takes in $922. But Chrysler (-$412), GM (-$729) and Ford (-$1,467) all lose money per model. That speaks to Detroit's inability to improve pricing on cars and trucks and ultimately that highlights the Big 3's next challenge of closing the perception gap.
This has been and will continue to be a tough issue to resolve. While Detroit's building better designed and quality cars and trucks, the public is slow to change it's attitude about a Chevy, Ford or Chrysler. Too often, people still view domestic models as being cheap and poorly built even though many models are every bit as good, if not better, than the competition. Take the Chevy Malibu or Ford Edge. Both models show Detroit can build winners people want to drive.
This is how the perception gap will be narrowed. Doing it one model at a time. If the U.S. automakers can follow up with more well designed and well made models they will catch their Asian rivals in the mind of the buyer, just as Chrysler has now done in assembly plant efficiency.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes