More Videos
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
- HP's Shot Across Cisco's Bow
- Back Off, Regulators!
MOST SHARED
- Analyze This?
- Realty Check: USDA Home Loans
- Health Care Bill Nears Test Vote
- Dems Snare 60 Votes to Move Ahead on Health Care
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates: Keeping America Great
- Inside A Revolutionary Brain Cancer Treatment
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Holiday Tipping: Who And How Much
- Deep Discounts Should Make It a Very Tech-y Holiday
- The Richest Members of the US Congress
- New Consensus Sees Stimulus Package as Worthy Step
- Black Friday Deals May Not Signal Retail Comeback
- Thanksgiving Week Stuffed With Economic News
- UPS Sets New Rates For 2010
- Wall Street Jobs Slow to Return Despite Record Profits
- Investors to Goldman: Be Less Greedy
- Victoria's Secret Hopes to Rekindle Desire for Lingerie
- 'New Moon' Takes Record $72.7M Box Office Bite
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
stevelyon Yahoo Center |
Sure the company and its nemesis, Carl Icahn, have joined forces so that bitter proxy contest could be eliminated.
But that doesn't mean they've pushed their differences aside, or that general shareholder bitterness doesn't remain. This is still a company on the ropes, still a company having its hat handed to it by rival Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
], this is still a company taking a drubbing in the media, and still a company with a stock price teetering at a paltry $20 a share when just a few short months ago, Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] was prepared to offer 70 percent more than that.
That last point is one of the reasons why Carl Icahn's pal, T. Boone Pickens, sold his entire Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
]stake this week--at a loss--and reportedly called the company's management "pathetic." It'll be interesting to gauge the opinions of the hundreds of shareholders likely to show up at Friday's meeting and whether they concur, or subscribe to management's outlook that the Microsoft offer was inadequate because Yahoo's longer term prospects are so robust.
I asked president Sue Decker about that last week. She stuck to her guns that Yahoo was indeed interested in "maximizing shareholder value," and that the board felt comfortable turning down Microsoft's offer. That it was Microsoft's decision to walk from negotiations, not Yahoo's.
I'm not sure about that, however. If that's true, it just doesn't seem to make sense that Microsoft would make an offer and then walk away before Yahoo responded. And if Yahoo turned it down -- far more likely -- what caused the company to come back weeks later practically begging Microsoft to re-engage in negotiations at the price Microsoft was already offering?
Remember that Microsoft had an offer of $33 on table, whether in writing or not, and Yahoo co-founders David Filo and Jerry Yang were dispatched to Redmond for a face-to-face meeting with Steve Ballmer, at which time Yang gave Microsoft his own price to sell, not his board's, at $37? Microsoft had to be wondering with whom it was supposed to be negotiating!
Look, all the facts are in dispute depending upon which rep from which camp you talk to. Decker made the strong case to me that Yahoo is in transition this year, and that the strategy would gain traction next year and 2010. She was passionate about it. And I believe she believes it.
Shareholders have to ask, however, how long--and how likely it is--that that strategy will lead to a 70 percent increase in Yahoo shares. That's the threshold. Yahoo had a lucrative bird in the hand, and let it fly away. And then weeks later came crawling back.
Why? Maybe Yahoo saw the earnings report it was on the verge of releasing and thought, hmmmm, we better do a deal. By then, it was too late, and Microsoft decided to move on.
Seems like a botched deal to me. On both sides. For shareholders of both companies. Egos played way to big a role here. On both sides. And shareholders, from the beginning, have been caught in the middle. Yahoo shareholders at least will have the opportunity to sound off at the meeting tomorrow. Some Yahoo board members might lose their jobs; Yang's job is also in jeopardy, though I'm not sure who could step in now as a replacement. But all that is neither here nor there.
Although Microsoft declares otherwise, I'm not sure a deal--any deal--with Yahoo is really dead. Like Miracle Max said, it just might be "mostly dead." Meantime, the shareholder meeting will be about the deal that got away. The deal that Yahoo's board let get away.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes