More Videos
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
- HP's Shot Across Cisco's Bow
- Back Off, Regulators!
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Holiday Tipping: Who And How Much
- Deep Discounts Should Make It a Very Tech-y Holiday
- What if a Recovery Is All in Your Head?
- A Taxpayer's Must Read: The Fed Waltz With AIG
- Health Care Bill Clears First Senate Hurdle
- Wall Street Jobs Slow to Return Despite Record Profits
- Investors to Goldman: Be Less Greedy
- Thanksgiving Week Stuffed With Economic News
- Real Estate Agents See Return of Foreign Buyers
- 10 Tips to Get Out of Debt
- 'New Moon' Takes Record $72.7M Box Office Bite
RSS FEED
Tech Check
Text Size 
 |
] had them; same with Yahoo [YHOO
Loading...
()
]. Research in Motion [RIMM
Loading...
()
] has suffered its fair (or unfair?) share too. But when Google's Gmail service went dark last night for about 90 minutes, cutting off millions of users from their email, it shone a bright light on the promise--and problems--of so-called Cloud Computing.
This is a big initiative by Google [GOOG
Loading...
()
], and so many others in technology nowadays: Hewlett-Packard [HPQ
Loading...
()
], Intel [INTC
Loading...
()
] and Yahoo recently announced a Cloud Computing push. Dell [DELL
Loading...
()
] is even trying to trademark the term "cloud computing," but even that's running into some jarring, regulatory bumps that might prevent the company from doing so.
For Google, Cloud Computing could be a big deal: the idea that all your information, personal data, digital entertainment, software applications, everything, is stored on a big network instead of, or maybe in addition to, the harddrive inside your own, personal computer. And then, of course, that (presumably) deeply protected and secure data would be accessible from any computer, anytime, anywhere. Very convenient.
Unless the network goes dark. I've written quite a bit about Cloud Computing, how it furthers the Sun Microsystems' [JAVA
Loading...
()
] co-founder Scott McNealy 1990s mantra of "the network is the computer." And if you believe all the big names mentioned previously, as well as Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
], Oracle [ORCL
Loading...
()
], Salesforce.com [CRM
Loading...
()
], among so many others, that concept has finally arrived. Even Apple Inc.'s [AAPL
Loading...
()
] Steve Jobs subscribes to all this. Consider: The new MacBook Air has no on-board DVD player. Why bother if consumers will simply be wirelessly accessing digital entertainment from a huge, high-speed network, rather than downloading anything or fiddling around with--heaven forbid--actual, physical digital media like DVDs and CDs.
It all sounds good. But when the network fails, users are dead in the water. Sure your PC can crash, but you can reboot it yourself, or troubleshoot, or bring it in to someone who can fix it. With Cloud Computing, there but for the grace of, in this case, Google's IT experts go you. And the problems, because of the size of Google's network, could be monumental, which could leave you offline for a long time, even if the problem is an easy one to fix.
In this case, Google got itself righted in 90 minutes. Not bad. I mean, if your computer at home crashed, and you're running Microsoft's Vista, that's about equal to your reboot-time. All this merely points to the potential pitfalls of Cloud Computing. Nice buzzword, lots of promise, lots of potential rewards, but certainly not without problems, too.
Google's Marissa Mayer was recently on our air telling our Dennis Kneale that outages just can't happen because consumers use the same networks that Google uses to run its business. Um, yeah. Her second point was much better: it's not whether your network could go down; it's how fast you can bring it back up.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes