Funny Business
- Is America Ready for a Bacon Milkshake?
- ‘Goodnight iPad’ — A Bedtime Story for Adults
- Can't Get in on the Facebook IPO, How About a Real Gamble?
- Funny Businesses For Ex-Lovers and Office Meetings
- Super Bowl Party Food Inflation
- Facebook Vs Apple - Who'd You Rather
- The Bennie Awards: Celebrating the Worst in TV
- CSI: Miami, The Funny Years
- Tesla Unveils First SUV: Model X
- New York Fashion Week Hits the Runway as Colors Pop
- Mulling Buffett's Stock Advice? Get in With REITs: Fund Managers
- LinkedIn Earnings Bode Well for Hiring and Social Media
- Top Five Mistakes to Avoid in Online Dating
- Victor Cruz ‘Understands’ Gisele's Super Bowl Frustrations
- Tamminen: The United States of India
- Unusual Volume: Taleo Jumps After Oracle's $1.9 Billion Offer
- Warren Buffett: Stocks Will Outperform Gold and Bonds .. and They're Safer 'By Far'
- Bonus Bloodbath: Europe Banker Backlash Continues
- Stocks Looking Past Europe for a New Driver of the Rally
- Israel Likely to Bomb Iran This Year: Political Analyst
- Greeks on Strike as the Second Bailout Is in Limbo
- EU Agrees Rules for $700 Trillion Derivatives Market
- The World's Best Beers
- Citigroup Takes $50 Million Loss in Lending Rate Probe
- Barclays Warns May Miss Medium-Term Profit Goal
- Will Romney Regret Opposing Michigan Auto Bailout?
RSS FEED
Barbie v. Bratz: How Much $$$ For Mattel?
BARBIE HOPES TO GUT BRATZ
(Updated: See end of article.)
![]() |
Bratz |
The jury already ruled last month that the idea for MGA's Bratz Dolls was conceived by former Mattel employee Carter Bryant while he was under contract at Mattel. Now the remaining nine jurors must unanimously decide how much money -- if any -- Mattel is due.
Mattel wants well over $1 billion from the company and MGA CEO Isaac Larian. But to get compensatory damages, the jury has to decide there are "substantial similarities" between the original designs and the final products (MGA says they are very different). And to award punitive damages, jurors have to be convinced the company and/or its CEO acted with malice, oppression or fraud.
Mattel is going first in closing arguments. Attorney John Quinn opened by telling jurors, "There's a right way to compete and a wrong way to compete. If you compete in a right way, you get to keep your profits."
But, he argues, both MGA and its CEO committed "theft," which made Isaac Larian a billionaire.
What does Mattel want? All net profits related to Bratz. Quinn calculates Mr. Larian alone has profited nearly $700 million just from Bratz, and MGA Entertainment netted $778 million. Mattel is also seeking interest on both amounts going back five years, at 7 percent, worth another $320 million, for total of approximately $1.8 billion.
Mattel wants another $340 million if jurors determine MGA's alleged copyright infringement was "willful." And we're not even halfway through Quinn's argument.
Quinn wants jurors to "return MGA to the position they were in without the theft." Which could be nowhere.
"Crime doesn't pay," he told the jury.
More to come -- when MGA gets its shot...
Update: Mattel's John Quinn ended his closing argument by suggesting jurors also award punitive damages to send a message to MGA Entertainment. Those damages cannot be beyond a defendant's ability to pay. And how much can MGA and Larian pay? Quinn says Larian's net worth before the trial was $1.9 billion but has fallen to $723 million, and MGA's worth was $2 billion pre-trial but is now $541 million.
Questions? Comments? Funny Stories? Email




Jane Wells is currently a CNBC business news reporter, based in Los Angeles, covering the defense and technology industries. Wells came from CNBC's “Upfront Tonight” where she was senior corresponde




