- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- Singh Not Wearing Stanford At Tournament
- Companies Behind Murray Have a Lot To Gain
- Hall Of Fame Suit Lists Revealing Numbers
- Sports Poker Event Trying To Buck Recession
- Billy Mays — He Left the World Knowing He Sold It
- NBA Draft: By The Numbers
- Vijay Singh Offers To Pay Stanford's Bail
- Is "The Big Pierogi" Next For Shaq?
- Singh Will Continue To Stick By Stanford
RSS FEED
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- 'We're in the Middle of a Crash': Black Swan
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- The Rising Mountain of Debt May Be the Next Crisis
- SEC May Reinstate Rules for Short-Selling Stocks
- Cuddle Parties Heat Up
- Malaysia PM Speaks to CNBC
- Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Will Resign
- Latvian Banker Taking Souls as Collateral
- The Worst Expected 2010 State Budget Gaps
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Fireworks At Pharma's Market
- Value of Warren Buffett's Annual Gift to Gates Foundation Falls Along With Berkshire's Stock
- Michael Jackson: The Music And The Money
- Five Stock Picks for This Market
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- Weak Dollar Means Gold at $1,040: Strategist
- Court Ruling Could Mean Trouble for TiVo
- Lance, Please Back Out Of Tour
- BOJ Shirakawa: Japan Corporate Finance Still Tight
- China Reassures on Dollar Debate Before G8
- Alcoa to Post Loss — What Does This Mean?
- A Goldman Trading Scandal?
- Top Videos: From the Black Swan to the Bond King

- Obama Plan Would Trim Back Financial Powerhouses
- Biden: 'We Misread How Bad The Economy Was'
- FedEx Sees Signs of a Turnaround: Report
- Property Tax Appeals Take Toll on Governments

![]() |
AP Rafael Nadal |
But dig a little deeper and you'll find a more intriguing business story.
As has been publicized, Nadal was supposed to wear a more conservative polo shirt during his play and looser, shorter pants.
Although Nadal's public relations person told The Wall Street Journal before the tournament that this was the Spaniard's choice, I knew from the start it couldn't have been. It was Nike's [NKE
Loading...
()
] choice. Why? Because just like Puma couldn't sell Serena catsuits, Nike can't sell cutoffs and tight capris to the average tennis player. Not only does the average tennis player not have the guns to showcase, but try wearing the cutoffs at a country club. And those pants? I've never seen one average Joe wearing those.
We know the story by now. Nadal said he couldn't get used to the attire in time and has worn his muscle T's and capris throughout the Open. Bottom line is it's a great look for Nadal and adds to his personality, but his clothing choice is admittedly bad for Nike's business.
Now let's focus on Fish, who is sponsored by K-Swiss [KSWS
Loading...
()
]. While Nike has still heavily advertised its affiliation with Nadal, Fish has been under the radar for K-Swiss -- which has chosen to upstage Fish with ads by using retired tennis player Anna Kournikova (who wore adidas when she was playing), Tommy Haas (who is now ranked No. 57 to Fish's No. 25) and Alona Bondarenko (who is No. 31 in the world and only got three games off Venus Williams in Flushing Meadows).
Unlike Nike, K-Swiss is a tennis brand and they can't really afford a situation like Nadal's: having a top star wear something that doesn't translate to the common folk. So since Fish switched from adidas [ADDYY
Loading...
()
] to K-Swiss late late year, he's been dressing in some of the most conservative outfits you've ever seen. On Sunday, for his big win over Gael Monfils, Fish wore what looked like a mostly plain white shirt with the K-Swiss logo on the upper left chest with a K-Swiss headband. He wore the black and gray versions for his night win against James Blake, but it's pretty much the same. Plain, blah, nothing special.
To the viewer, it might seem like K-Swiss -- which in July cut its outlook for 2008 off a 33 percent drop in revenue in the U.S. and flat international sales -- is missing out on an opportunity by not dressing up their unexpected star in a dynamic outfit like Nadal's. The truth is that given the game's participatory demographic, Fish's outfit is more likely to benefit from the exposure.
Questions? Comments?












