- NBA Development Team Ties Ticket Sales To Dow 10,000
- Round 5 Gets Grip on Mixed Martial Arts Figurine Biz
- Can Cyclife USA Ride "Healthy Green" Into American Cities?
- Ronnie Lott Helping Players Give Back
- What A Super Bowl Can Do For New Orleans
- How Much For A BCS Playoff?
- Athletes: Forget The Branding, Become An Identity Instead
- Lexus Going Ahead On Sports Sponsorships: Buick Cuts Back
- Boston Red Sox Fan Should Take Her Promotion Complaint Home
- Seeing the (Wake) Forest Through the (Cardinal) Trees
- Out with Cox, in with Uptick Rule
- Pops & Drops: Hewlett-Packard, JP Morgan & Air Wagoner
- Mad Money Green Week: Owens Corning
- Fast & Furious: It's All About Soup
- Web Extra: The Trade on Walmart and RIMM
- Chartology: Grossly Oversold and Favoring the Upside
- The "Armageddon" Gameplan
- What's Next for Citigroup?
- What to Expect From a Geithner-led Treasury
- Citigroup Talks, But Nothing 'Walks' To Stabilize
- Soros: More Money Needed For U.S. Bailout
- HP Earnings: How Much Will "Hurt" From Economy?
- Obama Warns On Economy: Works On Stimulus Plan
- Citigroup's Ills May Signal Market Isn't Near Bottom
- US Inflation Bonds Hit by Deflation, May Recover
- Pros Say: Market Will Drop 5-10% — Ford Will Boom
- Bonds Drop on Profit-Taking, Geithner Move
- Jack Welch on Detroit: Let Them Go Bankrupt

![]() |
AP Rafael Nadal |
But dig a little deeper and you'll find a more intriguing business story.
As has been publicized, Nadal was supposed to wear a more conservative polo shirt during his play and looser, shorter pants.
Although Nadal's public relations person told The Wall Street Journal before the tournament that this was the Spaniard's choice, I knew from the start it couldn't have been. It was Nike's [NKE
Loading...
()
] choice. Why? Because just like Puma couldn't sell Serena catsuits, Nike can't sell cutoffs and tight capris to the average tennis player. Not only does the average tennis player not have the guns to showcase, but try wearing the cutoffs at a country club. And those pants? I've never seen one average Joe wearing those.
We know the story by now. Nadal said he couldn't get used to the attire in time and has worn his muscle T's and capris throughout the Open. Bottom line is it's a great look for Nadal and adds to his personality, but his clothing choice is admittedly bad for Nike's business.
Now let's focus on Fish, who is sponsored by K-Swiss [KSWS
Loading...
()
]. While Nike has still heavily advertised its affiliation with Nadal, Fish has been under the radar for K-Swiss -- which has chosen to upstage Fish with ads by using retired tennis player Anna Kournikova (who wore adidas when she was playing), Tommy Haas (who is now ranked No. 57 to Fish's No. 25) and Alona Bondarenko (who is No. 31 in the world and only got three games off Venus Williams in Flushing Meadows).
Unlike Nike, K-Swiss is a tennis brand and they can't really afford a situation like Nadal's: having a top star wear something that doesn't translate to the common folk. So since Fish switched from adidas [ADDYY
Loading...
()
] to K-Swiss late late year, he's been dressing in some of the most conservative outfits you've ever seen. On Sunday, for his big win over Gael Monfils, Fish wore what looked like a mostly plain white shirt with the K-Swiss logo on the upper left chest with a K-Swiss headband. He wore the black and gray versions for his night win against James Blake, but it's pretty much the same. Plain, blah, nothing special.
To the viewer, it might seem like K-Swiss -- which in July cut its outlook for 2008 off a 33 percent drop in revenue in the U.S. and flat international sales -- is missing out on an opportunity by not dressing up their unexpected star in a dynamic outfit like Nadal's. The truth is that given the game's participatory demographic, Fish's outfit is more likely to benefit from the exposure.
Questions? Comments?



