More Videos
- Look Ahead: 'Risk On' Attitude Could Fuel Rally Further
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Buffett to Sell Stakes in Norfolk Southern, Union Pacific
- Cramer: 5 Stocks to Play the Next Bull Run
- Do You Know Your Coca-Cola Myths?
- Electronic Arts Beats Street, Announces 1,500 Job Cuts
- Time Is Here to Look at Overseas Stocks: Bill Gross
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Warren Buffett to Sell Stakes In Union Pacific & Norfolk Southern
- Nov. 9: Unusual Volume Leaders
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Merck’s Mega-Monday Morning
- Why are Traders Bullish on This Food Company?
- Profiting From Natural Gas: Strategists
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
MOST SHARED
- Obama Sees Strains Unless US, China Balance Growth
- Future of Marketing
- Priceline Crushes Profit Forecasts; Shares Jump
- Can Apple Top Microsoft as Most Valuable Tech Firm?
- Oil Tomorrow
- Mad Mail: Buy the Berkshire Hathaway Split?
- Sprint to Cut Up to 2,500 Jobs, Sees Charge
- Goldman Sachs Head Says Banks Do 'God's Work'
- European Commission Objects to Sun Micro-Oracle Deal
Text Size 
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan welcomed the recent takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, telling CNBC that the government needed "to remove the ambiguity" over whether US would back up the two mortgage giants.
 |
J. Scott Applewhite / AP |
In a live interview, Greenspan reiterated his criticism that the structure of Fannie [FNM
Loading...
()
] and Freddie Mac [FRE
Loading...
()
], which have private stockholders but have an implicit government guarantee, "socializes losses while privatizing gains."
This type of institution, he added, "should not exist in a competitive market environment."
Last week, Greenspan said Congress needs to give the government new powers to handle troubled companies to minimize any potential losses to American taxpayers.
A self-described libertarian Republican, Greenspan has a reputation for being wary of giving the government extra powers. (See part two here and part three here.)
However, in crisis situations, there needs to be a clear process for handling bailouts, rather than depending on the Fed to do so, he reckons. A high-level panel of financial officials should be given broad authority to quickly determine whether a failing company poses a sufficient threat to the entire U.S. economy, he recommends. If so, the company would be shut down.
"We need laws that specify and limit the conditions for bailouts -- laws that authorize the Treasury to use taxpayer money to counter systemic financial breakdowns transparently and directly rather than circuitously through the central bank as was done during the blowup of Bear Stearns," Greenspan wrote in a new epilogue to the paperback edition of his memoir, "The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World."
(The paperback was released today; the hardcover came out last year.)
Greenspan envisions the formation of a group akin to the Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC) to step in, take a troubled company into conservatorship, wipe out the equity, impose some charge or "haircut" on its debts before guaranteeing them and then selling its assets.
—AP contributed to this report.
Print
Email
- Do free market libertarians really believe what they say about ethics and shareholder value? The Big Money takes a look.
- Cramer did the research and found eight stocks that lead the pack. Read on to get his top picks.
- On the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, many in the former Eastern Bloc recall communism fondly.
- Software, biotech firms, even banks are watching a particular Supreme Court argument today.
- From politicians to CEOs to companies, here's your chance to vote for the winners and losers of 2009.
- A new sinister Internet viruses can turn you into an unsuspecting collector of child pornography.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes