Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- Commercial Conundrum
- Commercial Real Estate: 'Ticking Time Bomb'
- Bank-owned Inventory: Move it!
- Realities of the New Obama Refis
- A Bigger Housing Bailout for Obama
- Home Prices: Are We There Yet?
- Treasury: Jingle Mail A Myth
- How Bad Is The Housing Market? One Man's Tale
- Appraisal Code Sparks Huge Response
- New Rules on Home Appraisals End Up Thwarting Many Sales
|
CNBC'S MOST SHARED
- Unemployed? Bored? Make Money Playing Beer Pong
- The Highest Grossing (Inflation Adjusted) Movies of All Time
- Social Networking's 'Naked' Truth
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Merrill's McCann Seen as UBS Wealth Frontrunner
- Warren Buffett's Top Three Investment Rules for the Average American
- Why You Should Watch Fund Flows
- WPP's Sir Martin Sorrell on the Ad Recession
- Four Things You Should Be Doing Now To Break Out
- Proprietary Trading May Cause October Crash: Investor
- Eric Schmidt on Government Scrutiny and Economic Recovery
- Market 360: The Week's Best & Worst
- Geek Squad V. Gizmodo
- Brandt: Google Chrome OS in the Post-PC Age
- Other People Are Weirder Than We Are
- Bank Failures: Is The Nightmare Over? (Video)
- California Here I Go? No.
- Roginsky: No More Mr. Nice Guy
- Commercial Conundrum
- Cheney Told CIA to Withhold Information: Report
- Why the Credit Pendulum Is Stuck at 'Stupid'
- Stimulus Will Kick in Later this Year: President Obama
- Lender CIT Group Hires Premier Bankruptcy Adviser
- Government Selling Bank Stakes for Too Cheap: Panel
- Buffett's Top 3 Investment Rules for Average Americans
- Market Insider: Earnings Loom in the Week Ahead
- Bulls Get Summertime Blues, But It's Hot Fun for Bears
- As Banks Fail, Strong Institutions Become More Visible
RSS FEED

![]() |
CNBC.com |
Former Fannie employees in formerly high-ranking positions had suggested to me a few months ago that the 10Q would look particularly grim this third quarter, for reasons part fiscal and part political. But I’m not interested in looking back; I’m looking forward, and unfortunately Fannie’s future looks pretty grim.
According to today’s filing, Fannie has “experienced reduced demand for our debt obligations from some of our historical sources of that demand, particularly in international markets. There are several factors contributing to the reduced demand for our debt securities, including continued severe market disruptions, market concerns about our capital position and the future of our business (including its future profitability, future structure, regulatory actions and agency status) and the extent of U.S. government support for our business.” And there you have it.
I was also looking through what they call the “Credit Supplement” in the filing, specifically to see just how all those Fannie loans are doing, now that we’re all about modifications and saving the housing planet and all. It appears the 2006 and 2007 vintages of loans held or guaranteed by Fannie are on life support. Together they now make up 66 percent of the company’s Q3 credit losses. Were Fannie underwriters out for coffee for two years or what?? Remember, Fannie supposedly doesn’t do subprime loans. They did, however, do Alt-A loans, that is the low doc, no doc, don’t tell anyone anything about your ability to actually repay anything borrower. As one analyst put it to me this morning: “They just waved it in, yeah, they stopped underwriting - That is what Alt-A was.”
This particular guy thinks the 07/08 vintages will be even worse, setting new records for defaults. In the 10Q Fannie detailed at length its modification programs including loan workouts, additional loans to help borrowers in financial difficulty bring loans current and increased outreach to delinquent borrowers. Nowhere did it say anything about actually writing down the principal on the loans, which is a requirement of the government bailout plans though not a requirement of the conservatorship. The CEOs of Fannie and Freddie recently said writing down principal would be necessary, but so far, I’m not seeing it.
The feeling I get from this particular 10Q is brash uncertainty. And that’s a little scary, given today’s economic climate and the size of this particular mortgage entity. No wait, that’s a lot scary.
Questions? Comments?











