Current Housing Indicators |
| CURRENT | PREVIOUS | ||
| Existing Home Sales | 4.49m | ▼ | 4.74m |
| New Home Sales | 309,000 | ▼ | 344,000 |
| Housing Starts | 583,000 | ▲ | 477,000 |
| Building Permits | 547,000 | ▲ | 531,000 |
| HMI | 9 | UNCH | 9 |
| Existing Home Prices | $170,300 | ▼ (annually) | $199,800 |
| New Home Prices | $201,100 | ▼ (annually) | $232,400 |
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- Despite Government Aid, Foreclosure Crisis is Not Improving
- Housing Data Delivers Mixed Messages
- Appraisals Now Center Stage in Housing Recovery
- Underwater Mortgages Could Sink Even Deeper
- First Time Buyers Rescue Housing: Realtors
- Housing Recovery 'Still In Uncharted Territory': HUD Secretary
- Shadow Inventory Dwarfs Loan Mods
- The Battered Businesses Behind Housing
- Watch Foreclosures, Seriously
- CNBC VIDEO: Warren Buffett & Bill Gates 'Walk & Talk' at Columbia University
- U.S. Stocks Slip, Dollar Rises
- How Stock Investors Can Play Holiday Travel
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- May Day For Dendreon
- 100% Mortgage Financing From USDA
- US Job Losses to Bottom out Next Quarter: NABE
- Late Payments on Credit Cards Drop in Third Quarter
- Smallest US Businesses Borrowing Again: PayNet
- Little Sign of Inflation on the Horizon: IMF
- Kraft Weighs Higher Cadbury Bid as Rivals Circle
- MBS Program Should be Extended: Fed's Bullard
- JPMorgan's Dimon Could Succeed Geithner: Report
- Wall Street Finds Profits by Reducing Mortgages
- Microsoft, News Corp Weigh Online News Pact
RSS FEED
Realty Check
![]() |
CNBC.com |
Former Fannie employees in formerly high-ranking positions had suggested to me a few months ago that the 10Q would look particularly grim this third quarter, for reasons part fiscal and part political. But I’m not interested in looking back; I’m looking forward, and unfortunately Fannie’s future looks pretty grim.
According to today’s filing, Fannie has “experienced reduced demand for our debt obligations from some of our historical sources of that demand, particularly in international markets. There are several factors contributing to the reduced demand for our debt securities, including continued severe market disruptions, market concerns about our capital position and the future of our business (including its future profitability, future structure, regulatory actions and agency status) and the extent of U.S. government support for our business.” And there you have it.
I was also looking through what they call the “Credit Supplement” in the filing, specifically to see just how all those Fannie loans are doing, now that we’re all about modifications and saving the housing planet and all. It appears the 2006 and 2007 vintages of loans held or guaranteed by Fannie are on life support. Together they now make up 66 percent of the company’s Q3 credit losses. Were Fannie underwriters out for coffee for two years or what?? Remember, Fannie supposedly doesn’t do subprime loans. They did, however, do Alt-A loans, that is the low doc, no doc, don’t tell anyone anything about your ability to actually repay anything borrower. As one analyst put it to me this morning: “They just waved it in, yeah, they stopped underwriting - That is what Alt-A was.”
This particular guy thinks the 07/08 vintages will be even worse, setting new records for defaults. In the 10Q Fannie detailed at length its modification programs including loan workouts, additional loans to help borrowers in financial difficulty bring loans current and increased outreach to delinquent borrowers. Nowhere did it say anything about actually writing down the principal on the loans, which is a requirement of the government bailout plans though not a requirement of the conservatorship. The CEOs of Fannie and Freddie recently said writing down principal would be necessary, but so far, I’m not seeing it.
The feeling I get from this particular 10Q is brash uncertainty. And that’s a little scary, given today’s economic climate and the size of this particular mortgage entity. No wait, that’s a lot scary.
Questions? Comments?









