Money & Politics
- An Interview with Tom Coburn
- President Zero Sum Goes to Asia
- Is Government-Run Health Care Going to Pass?
- The Congressional Assault on Fed Independence
- Addicted to Easy Money?
- A Red-Ink Train Wreck: The Real Fiscal Cost of Government-Run Healthcare
- A Short-Sighted Cheer for Easy Money
- Stocks and Voters Show GOP the Way
- Is the Obama Bubble About to Burst?
- The Economics of a Three-Race GOP Sweep
SHOW TIMES
Weeknights 7p ET
CNBC Asia:
Saturday 06:00 SIN/HK
Sunday 04:00 SIN/HK
CNBC Europe:
Monday - Friday 10:00 CET
Saturday 06:00 CET
Sunday 04:00 CET
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Nielsen Ratings Coming to Video Games
- Confessions of a Black Friday Shopper
- Oil Next Week
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- The Week Ahead
- 'New Moon' Midnight Showings Earn Record $26.3 Million
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Hot Topics at TEDMED
- Bove: Expect Goldman To Increase Dividend Meaningfully
CONTACT US
We want To hear from you!
E-mail:
Anchor
In a pleasant surprise, Team Obama is adding a series of business tax cuts to their overall stimulus package. News reports suggest that personal tax credits along with the new business tax cuts will comprise roughly 40 percent of the estimated $750 billion package.
The two big features on the business side are net-operating-loss carry-backs and carry-forwards, along with larger investment write-offs for small business that move the limit up to $250,000 from the current $175,000 level. The write-offs for losses both past and future will of course provide cash- and credit-short companies with some important tax relief. I don’t know if this includes banks, but it should. If banks sell toxic assets at a loss, they should be permitted to take these carry-back or carry-forward deductions. In some cases it could even mean cash refunds.
However, as yet there is no Obama signal for the most powerful tax incentives that would slash the 35 percent top corporate rate to something around 20 percent. This should apply both to large C-corps and small-business S-corps. It would attract investment, improve future job creation, and relieve consumers who really shoulder the corporate tax costs. Additionally, full cash expensing for business investment write-offs would provide an even greater bang for the buck.
So while the new tax refund plan and faster depreciation are positives, they are still much weaker than a full-bore supply-side tax-rate reduction that could even morph into full-fledged corporate tax reform. Now we wait for a Republican response, which hopefully will be bold corporate tax reform as well as reduced individual tax rates (at least for the middle class).
The GOP should weigh in with a bold alternative. As I wrote last week, Republicans should provide a clear choice — not an echo.






