Skip navigation


Current DateTime: 12:26:04 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24355697
  • Runway Angels

      The superbowl of fashion shows, models walk down the runway at the 2009 Victoria's Secret Show.

  • Smartphone Guide

      Here's a need-to-know guide to nine devices, based on features, price, network and platform.

  • Wines for the Holidays

      Not quite sure what wine to pair with Turkey or Creme Brulee? Our experts do.

FEATURED QUIZZES


Current DateTime: 12:26:04 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 33793611
  • How Well Do You Know Your Bird?

      Let's talk turkey. Test your turkey knowledge and perhaps pick up a bit of trivia to trot out at your holiday meal.

  • A Healthier & Wealthier You

      Take the following quiz and find out how much you know about the impact of obesity on the health of the U.S. economy.

  • The Billionaire BFF's

      Philanthropists. Bridge partners. Hockey players. Which responses are based on facts from Buffett's and Gates' real lives?


Current DateTime: 12:26:03 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 24890560
  • Winterizing Your Portfolio

      If 2009 was the winter of our discontent, will 2010 be a winter wonderland for investors? A lot depends on the recovery—or lack thereof.

  • Investor's Guide to Real Estate

      Some even say the long-awaited recovery is here. Regardless, buyers and sellers alike can profit from our guide.

  • Alternative Investing

      Stocks and bonds? Sure. But it's a big world out there for investors.

powered by digg
Bill Gross Warns Against Nationalizing Banks
By: The New York Times | 24 Feb 2009 | 01:05 PM ET
Text Size

“If you thought Lehman Brothers was a mistake, just standby and see what nationalizing Citi or BofA would do.”

Those dire words come from William H. Gross, who manages the largest bond mutual fund in the United States as the co-chief investment officer for the Pacific Investment Management Company.

In his March investment commentary, posted Tuesday on Pimco’s Web site, Mr. Gross weighed in on the great debate over whether troubled American banks should be taken over by the government. (In what we think is an unrelated development, he also talks about the disappearance of his mustache.)

Holders of bank shares, such as Citigroup and Bank of America, are watching the nationalization debate closely, because a government takeover would probably leave them wiped out, or at least severely diluted.

In arguing against nationalization, Mr. Gross takes aim at some notable figures — specifically Nouriel Roubini, the economics professor at New York University who predicted much of the current financial crisis; Christopher Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee; and Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve.

All three of those people have recently suggested, to varying degrees, that while nationalization is usually to be avoided, temporarily taking control of some banks might be the best way for the government to calm the financial storm.

Not so, Mr. Gross says in his commentary, which is structured as a question-and-answer session before members of Congress.

“I think Roubini, Dodd and Greenspan haven’t thought this one through,” Mr. Gross says in his mock testimony.


Current DateTime: 12:26:04 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 22528754

Making reference to the much-discussed Swedish solution to that country’s banking crisis in the early 1990s, he continued: “The U.S. isn’t Sweden, and not just because our blondes aren’t au naturel,” he writes. “Their successful approach revolved around a handful of banks but we have 7,500, as well as many S&Ls and credit unions, which would have to be flushed into government hands.”

Instead, he says, Washington should focus on creating credit and preventing more home foreclosures.

Of course, for a bond-fund manager like Mr. Gross, the issue is hardly just an academic one. Shareholders are sure to suffer in a bank nationalization, but holders of bonds might get hit as well — an event that Mr. Gross says would roil the credit markets even more.

He writes:

    "Forcing creditors to take haircuts would undermine other financial sectors such as insurance companies and credit unions. The goal of future policy should be to recapitalize lending institutions while maintaining the basic infrastructure of credit markets. Outright nationalization and haircutting of creditors will do just the opposite."

This story originally appeared in the The New York Times
Tools:
Print EmailAdd This share icon
  • digg share

CNBC HIGHLIGHTS

  • These four sectors will be the next to lead the market.
  • Zhu Zhu Pets are this year's must-have toy, fetching $40 or more on eBay.
  • T shirt man
  • From the why-didn’t-I-think-of-that file, we present Jason Sadler, a man whose job is wearing T-shirts.
  • It may be the most unusual guide to business you'll read.
  • Shopping for a gadget hound? The choices can be baffling. Here are a few that should be a hit.
  • "The Who" will be the halftime act for Super Bowl XLIV on Feb. 7 in Miami. Is the NFL behind the times?
ADD COMMENTS
Remaining characters


Current DateTime: 01:01:49 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 01:01:49 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 01:01:49 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779199

Current DateTime: 01:01:50 28 Nov 2009
LinksList Documentid: 29779198
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2009 CNBC, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBC Universal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters