CNBC Two-Way Street
RSS FEED
- CNBC Anchor Takes a Sabbatical
- Links: More Important Than We May Think
- Changing What Was Said
- Radio Rounds: A Job Loss and Education
- A Big Net Deal: Getting Staff's Attention
- Site Hot Links? Fear and Greed
- Balloon Boy: Not Your Average Business Story
- Hot Items: Gold, Gifts and Gritty Prison Fights
- Hot Links for Monday
MOST SHARED
- The Executive Job Search
- S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Where Do Pardoned Turkeys Go?
- Judge Erases Couple's $525,000 Mortgage Payment
- Activision Prepares to Double Dip on ‘Modern Warfare 2’
- US Mint to Suspend American Eagle Gold 1-Ounce Coins
- Salvation Army's Kettles Now Credit Card-Ready
- 'Cancer of Fraud' Permeates US Health Care System
- Oil Friday
- US Plans to Reduce Emissions By 17% Within Next Ten Years
- 4 Enemies of Bull Markets
- Experiencing Technical Difficulty?
- The Importance of Good Breadth
- Your First Move For Friday November 27th
- How Big Money Rules the Markets
- Web Extra: Private Equity, Conviction Buy?
- Follow the Leader
- Pops & Drops: Abercrombie & Fitch, Nucor...
- Giving Thanks: Seymour
- Your Questions About... Alcoa & The Dollar
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
There are certain words and phrases that scare readers off, especially in business news. Believe or not, they scare off newsrooms too.
This is a particular problem for news managers (that'd be, cough, me). We know that a certain
![]() |
We have one of the these types of stories today. But I finally managed to get my staff to pay attention to it at our morning news meeting.
"Folks," I said (okay, I'm cleaning this up a bit for publication). "What if we couldn't put up all our news stories and videos because the Internet pipes were too clogged? Would we stay in business long?"
I got a few stunned looks.
"Or what if someone said to us: 'Hey, you do too much broadband-hogging stuff. We're going to limit how much you can do in a day.' Would we like that?"
Now the entire news staff was focused (a noteworthy development). And so I'm confident our coverage of ... net neutrality ... will be on target today. (The FCC will be taking up the issue)
Yes, I kind of simplified the conflict. Net neutrality involves a lot of considerations and there are good arguments and legitimate points of view on every side of the issue. But that dang term ... net neutrality ... just doesn't invite rapt interest among readers AND writers. The stories get little readership and perfunctory coverage (okay, there's an exception from time to time).
But there's nothing like making it personal. So maybe this time?








