CNBC Two-Way Street
RSS FEED
- Links: More Important Than We May Think
- Changing What Was Said
- Radio Rounds: A Job Loss and Education
- A Big Net Deal: Getting Staff's Attention
- Site Hot Links? Fear and Greed
- Balloon Boy: Not Your Average Business Story
- Hot Items: Gold, Gifts and Gritty Prison Fights
- Hot Links for Monday
- Swine Flu By Any Other Name ... Like H1N1
MOST SHARED
- Nielsen Ratings Coming to Video Games
- Time Lapse World Series Is A Great Play
- Oil Next Week
- The Week Ahead
- 'New Moon' Midnight Showings Earn Record $26.3 Million
- Twilight, Inc., A Worldwide Craze
- Hot Topics at TEDMED
- Bove: Expect Goldman To Increase Dividend Meaningfully
- Hershey Mulls $17 Billion Bid for Cadbury: Source
- Confessions of a Black Friday Shopper
- Time to Buy Treasurys?
- Lightning Round: Las Vegas Sands, ADC Telecom, Satyam Computer and More
- Lightning Round OT: Knight Capital, Ebix and More
- Is Lear, Back From Bankruptcy, a Buy?
- Sanofi-Aventis Falling Off a Patent Cliff?
- Cramer: Your Thanksgiving Week Game Plan
- Your First Move For Monday November 23rd
- Burned By JPMorgan, Whirlpool & More
- The Latest Picks That Paid - Friday November 20th
- Web Extra: Defense, Defense
Managing Editor, CNBC.com
There are certain words and phrases that scare readers off, especially in business news. Believe or not, they scare off newsrooms too.
This is a particular problem for news managers (that'd be, cough, me). We know that a certain
![]() |
We have one of the these types of stories today. But I finally managed to get my staff to pay attention to it at our morning news meeting.
"Folks," I said (okay, I'm cleaning this up a bit for publication). "What if we couldn't put up all our news stories and videos because the Internet pipes were too clogged? Would we stay in business long?"
I got a few stunned looks.
"Or what if someone said to us: 'Hey, you do too much broadband-hogging stuff. We're going to limit how much you can do in a day.' Would we like that?"
Now the entire news staff was focused (a noteworthy development). And so I'm confident our coverage of ... net neutrality ... will be on target today. (The FCC will be taking up the issue)
Yes, I kind of simplified the conflict. Net neutrality involves a lot of considerations and there are good arguments and legitimate points of view on every side of the issue. But that dang term ... net neutrality ... just doesn't invite rapt interest among readers AND writers. The stories get little readership and perfunctory coverage (okay, there's an exception from time to time).
But there's nothing like making it personal. So maybe this time?








