Tech Check
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- My Top 10 Tech Toys for the Holidays
- iPhone a Better Gaming Platform Than Android?
- Dell Has Some Explaining to Do
- Dell May Start to Show Some Promise
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Intel's Andy Bryant Offers An Explanation
- Apple's Global Retail Invasion
- Intel Settles; AMD Settles the Score
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- China Eastern to Complete Shanghai Air Buy by End '09
- JAL Slides to Record Low on Bankruptcy Jitters
- Prepare For Large Decline In Stocks, Next Year?
- Gold Will Collapse Like Oil Did in 2008: Charts
- The Social Media Gaming Threat
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- Nielsen Ratings Coming to Video Games
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- HP's Mark Hurd
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- 9 Stocks That Play Rising Water Costs: Strategists
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Gold Prices Can Double in 3 Years: Portfolio Manager
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Strong Banks, Weak Credit: Treasury Rethinks TARP
- How Many US Consumers Will Shop this Weekend?
- Tuesday's Heavy Dose of Data to Dictate 'Risk' Behavior
- World's Largest Share Issue Priced at Deep Discount
- Obama says Boosting US Jobs is Top Priority
- Playboy to Outsource Most Magazine Operations: Report
- Why the Dollar Will Likely Stay Weak for Some Time
- EU Drops Proceedings Against Qualcomm
- Appeals Court Denies Microsoft's Alcatel Petition
RSS FEED
Text Size 
CNBC Silicon Valley Bureau Chief
When is a layoff really a layoff? A job cut versus a position elimination? Such was the craziness around Microsoft's "layoff" news today and why there was so much confusion swirling around about whether the company was expanding or even contracting its job-cut plans announced earlier this year.
 |
Some background: Microsoft [MSFT
Loading...
()
] announced in January plans to cut 5,000 positions or about 5 percent of its global workforce.
A few weeks ago, in a 10Q filed with the SEC connected to its quarterly earnings, Microsoft disclosed that the cutbacks that were supposed to be completed by June 2010 were actually completed far earlier.
But while the company did indeed eliminate 5,000 jobs, it only reduced headcount by 4,600 people. That's because 400 employees found work elsewhere inside the company.
Microsoft says it actually "hired" 2,000 workers this year. Not necessarily "new" workers all, but some employee transfers who might have lost their jobs in one unit only to be picked up by another unit.
Same goes with the 800 "additional" job cuts Microsoft is announcing today.
According to a spokesman, Microsoft is adding 800 job cuts to that original 5,000, bringing the total job cuts to 5,800. However, like the original 5,000, some of the 800 people being notified today that their jobs are being eliminated might be absorbed elsewhere in the Microsoft machine.
So, what's the real number of job cuts? 5,800. What's the real number of people who have actually lost their jobs and are leaving the company? No one seems to know, and we probably won't know until the company releases its next earnings report in January.
For what it's worth.
Questions? Comments?
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes