Pharma's Market
SPECIAL REPORT
MOST SHARED
- How Rescuing Greece Could Destroy the World
- A King Dollar GOP?
- How to Date a Wall Street Man
- Mario Monti on Italy's Economic Future
- The World's Best Beers
- Dow vs. S&P 500: Which is a Better Investment?
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- Mario Monti's Efforts Good Enough?
- Blue Ivy Gets Trademarked by Beyonce and Jay-Z
- Greek PM on New Debt Deal
- In Search of America's ‘Hottest Forecasters’
- Dow vs. S&P 500: Which is a Better Investment?
- Mick Fleetwood on the MP3 ‘Dumbing Down’ of Music
- Avis on the Road to Strong Growth: Analyst
- Private Homebuilders: Dead Men Walking
- LinkedIn’s Growth Is Already Priced In: Analyst
- The Real Reason Behind Bank of America’s Rally
- 5 Hedge Funds’ Top Stocks Soar After 2011 Rout
- This Valentine’s Day Love Is Served on a Silver Platter
- Private Homebuilders in the US: Dead Men Walking
- Dividend Payout Could Hit Record Amount This Year
- With Investors So Bullish, Stock Pullback Must Be Ahead
- Is Bill Gross, PIMCO's Bond King, Losing His Touch?
- Greece Austerity Deal Runs Into Trouble Once Again
- Why Saving Greece Could Destroy the World
- Apple’s Record Run: $500 Is a Magic Number
- Housing Still Hurting Consumers, Economy: Bernanke
- Get Ready for $5 Gas This Year: Ex-Shell CEO
RSS FEED
Rewriting AstraZeneca's Script
CNBC Correspondent
![]() |
Getty Images |
That was kind of my flippant takeaway from the head-spinning lead paragraph (below) in AstraZeneca's [AZN
Loading...
()
] press release last night about the FDA okay of its cholesterol drug Crestor for a broader patient population.
"AstraZeneca today announced that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved CRESTOR (rosuvastatin calcium) to reduce the risk of stroke, myocardial infarction (heart attack) and arterial revascularization procedures in individuals without clinically evident coronary heart disease but with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) based on age (men ≥50 and women ≥60), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥ 2 mg/L, and the presence of at least one additional CVD risk factor, such as hypertension, low HDL-C, smoking, or a family history of premature coronary heart disease."
Huh? What's that? Come again? I can just hear a patient saying after reading that, "Does that mean me? I hope my doctor can help me make sense of this."
Reporters quickly regurgitated all that medical gobbledygook in language laypeople could easily understand:
Associated Press: "Federal regulators have granted AstraZeneca approval to market its cholesterol pill Crestor as a preventive measure against heart attack and stroke in patients with healthy cholesterol levels."
Dow Jones: "...the FDA Monday said it (Crestor) can now be prescribed to prevent heart disease in people with apparently normal levels of bad cholesterol but other risk factors for heart disease, including elevated blood levels of a protein linked to heart disease."
Reuters: "AstraZeneca won U.S. approval on Monday to promote cholesterol fighter Crestor for preventing heart disease in a vast new market of people with healthy cholesterol but other heart risks."
I get that drug companies have to mind their p's and q's with the FDA and don't want to talk down to an audience of prescribing physicians, but they can still speak English. And in an era, for better or worse, when so many more patients are getting their medical information on Web sites and through social media, drug approval press releases—especially ones for a drug as widely-used as Crestor—need to be clear and concise.
You can still do all of the FDA-mandated prescribing details, please just don't put it at the top.
Analyst opinions on the expanded Crestor approval are mixed. Some say the bigger issue for AZN is the looming Crestor patent challenge.
As I write this, the stock is the biggest dollar and percentage gainer in big pharma, but it's already off the highs of the morning.
UPDATE: The Food and Drug Administration issued a press release on the additional Crestor approval a day late, but the agency's announcement is much better written than the company's.
If the FDA can put it in plain English, why can't AstraZeneca?
Questions? Comments? and follow me on Twitter at mhuckman










