Skip navigation


Current DateTime: 09:28:16 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 24355697

Current DateTime: 09:28:16 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 23452764
Expiration DateTime: 2/9/2012 9:30:24 AM

MOST SHARED


Current DateTime: 09:28:18 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 31330905
Expiration DateTime: 2/9/2012 9:30:45 AM

Current DateTime: 09:28:18 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 35819650
    • Road Warriors

        All the gadgets and gear a savvy frequent traveler needs to navigate the global economy.


Current DateTime: 09:28:18 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 35819653

Financial Reform Bill Is A ‘Disaster’: Sen. Gregg

Published: Monday, 24 May 2010 | 11:22 AM ET
Text Size
By: Natalie Erlich
CNBC.com Writer/Producer

The financial regulatory bill is a “disaster,” and its proposed consumer protection agency would create a Fannie and Freddie “on steroids,” Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. told CNBC on Monday.

“The bill is a disaster because it doesn’t address the fundamental underlining causes of the economic issue, which were real estate and underwriting,” he said. “This bill became, ‘I want to score the most points against Wall Street.’ Most of the initiative of this bill wasn’t directed at solving the problem, but it was directed at scoring political points.”

Gregg, who sits on the Senate banking, budget and appropriations committees proposed underwriting standards along with Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., yet they were not included in the final bill, he said.

The Senate version of financial reform was approved late last week and must now be reconciled with the House version before it is signed into law by President Obama.

Meanwhile, the provision on consumer protection will expand the reach of government and create conflicts with the banking industry, Gregg said.

“You’ll basically have a consumer protection agency which decides to go out and in the morning and say, ‘well everybody who’s XYZ should have a loan, even though the local community bank says XYZ shouldn’t have a loan, because if we give them a loan, we know they’re not going to pay back,’” he said. “It’s going to become an agency that defines lending on social justice purposes instead of safety and soundness purposes.”

Gregg also blasted derivatives language in the bill, saying that it lacks coherence.

“You’ve got this Alice in Wonderland tea party atmosphere around derivatives,” he said. “Basically, the construct is it will make the derivatives in the market less sound, it will cause a huge contraction of credit—maybe up to three-quarters of a trillion dollars—and it will push massive amounts of derivative activity offshore and out of our control. So they will become even less controllable in the sense of having oversight.”

Despite the bill’s major flaws, said Gregg, it does include redeeming points like “too big to fail.” For example, the bill authorizes regulators to impose restrictions on large, troubled financial institutions. It also creates a process for the government to liquidate failing companies at no cost to taxpayers.

__________________________________________________

An Opposing View on Financial Regulation Overhaul:

© 2012 CNBC.com


Current DateTime: 08:36:39 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29778428

Current DateTime: 05:34:08 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779196

Current DateTime: 09:19:18 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779197

Current DateTime: 05:34:08 09 Feb 2012
LinksList Documentid: 29779199
CNBCCNBC
About CNBC  |  Site Map  |  Video Reprints   |  Advertise  |  Help  |  Contact
Privacy Policy  |     |  Terms of Service  |  Independent Programming Report
  Data is a real-time snapshot  *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes
Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis

© 2012 CNBC LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
A Division of NBCUniversal
Thomson ReutersThomson Reuters