Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

ETFs: New Warnings of Systemic Risk

 Text Size  
Published: Wednesday, 20 Apr 2011 | 9:59 AM ET
Herb Greenberg By:

CNBC Senior Stocks Commentator

Concerns over the possibility that ETFs could lead to systemic risk are hardly new.

I’ve certainly written about them enough, starting with a controversial report in September about whether an ETF could collapse, and another, in November, with the Kauffman Foundation study about systemic risk.

In each case the critics assailed the reports as having been written by people who in, in some way, are biased in favor of the traditional mutual fund industry.

Never mind how nonsensical that is: The risks are and were real — even if they never amount to anything.

But now several warnings are coming back-to-back-to-back that can't be ignored:

- from the International Monetary Fund,

- the G20 Financial Stability Board,

- and the The Bank for International Settlements — no slouch organization, considering that it is the central bank of all central banks.

The BIS's take, in a working paper headlined, “Market Structures and Systemic Risks of Exchange-Traded Funds" is, in effect, this:

ETFs originally were marketed as “plain vanilla type flexible and transparent investment products that can be traded like stocks on an exchange.”

But in classic Wall Street style, investors seeking an edge have demanded more innovation.

The result: Increasingly exotic ETF structures are more complicated and risky, even with their claims of transparency. Many of the most exotic are leveraged ETFs, which juice returns to multiples of the indexes they track. According to the study, those leveraged ETFs account for nearly 20 percent of ETF turnover, even though they represent 3 percent of ETF assets.

Then there are options on ETFs, which have become popular with hedge funds. Citing a J.P. Morgan report, the study notes that average daily volume of options on ETFs now exceeds “those of all U.S. stock options combined.”

The report also discusses counterparty risk associated with ETFs, but the bottom line: Those "structured product" derivatives that got us in the last financial mess started as transparent, plain-vanilla products, too.

My take: I realize there is strong disagreement on this issue, but this is not uninformed, Henny Penny "the sky is falling" analysis. It's simply raising awareness of the risks. If you’re interested, I suggest reading the report. Good history starts in Section 5, Page 10.

Questions? Comments? Write to HerbOnTheStreet@cnbc.com

Follow Herb on Twitter: @herbgreenberg

_____________________________
CNBC Data Pages:

______________________________

Disclaimer

 Print
Critics assailed earlier warnings as having been written by people who in, in some way, are biased in favor of the traditional mutual fund industry. But now several warnings are coming back-to-back-to-back that can't be ignored.

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:


                
            
            
        

Featured

  • Patti Domm is CNBC Executive Editor, News, responsible for news coverage of the markets and economy.

  • Greenberg is senior stocks commentator for CNBC appearing throughout business day programming and on CNBC.com.

  • A CNBC reporter since 1990, Pisani reports on Wall Street and the stock market from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Follow him on Twitter @BobPisani.

  • Epperson covers the global energy, metals and commodities markets from the NY Mercantile Exchange for CNBC and CNBC.com.

  • Santelli joined CNBC Business News as an on-air editor in 1999, reporting live from the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade.

  • Senior Editor at CNBC, commodity trader in a former life.

  • CNBC Markets Producer

  • Senior Producer at CNBC's Breaking News Desk.

  • Website Producer at CNBC