Net

Email:
Call: 201-735-4638
Text Message: 917-740-8477

John Carney
Runs this joint.
Jeff Cox
A senior writer for CNBC.com, covering the gamut of issues affecting the stock market and the economy.
Stephanie Landsman
Squawk Boxer Rebel.
Lori Spechler
A Senior Editor at CNBC, commodity trader in a former life.
Lori Ann LaRocco
A Senior Talent Producer at CNBC.

The Faces of 'Occupy Wall Street'
Occupy Wall Street has attracted people from all backgrounds.
The Greatest Trades of All Time
The following list of people showcases some of the greatest trades in the business.
Rogue Trading: A How-To Guide
There's a surprisingly consistent pattern to all these rogue traders.
25 Things Every Wall Street Intern Should Know
Some words of wisdom for all the Wall Street Interns this summer.

» Help

Subscribe to this RSS feed
Stay up to date with NetNet.

Moody's Reveals Huge Taxpayer Subsidy for Banks

Published: Thursday, 2 Jun 2011 | 3:44 PM ET

Text Size

By: John Carney
Senior Editor, CNBC.com

The news that Moody’s is reviewing the debt ratings of Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citigroup shows how dependent these banks have been on the invisible and unwilling support of the American taxpayer.

Moody’s [MCO Loading... () ] explained in its press release that the debt ratings of the three banks have incorporated “unusual levels of uplift” based on the assumption that they would be prevented from failing by the United States government. It’s now reviewing that assumption based on the Dodd-Frank financial reforms that promise an end to bailouts.

"The US government's intent under Dodd-Frank is very clear," says Moody’s Senior Vice President Sean Jones. "Going forward, it does not want to bail out even large, systemically important banking groups."

Nonetheless, Moody’s is skeptical about the No Bailout promises of Dodd-Frank. In particular, Moody’s doesn’t buy the FDIC’s claim that it can “resolve” large, complex financial institutions without risking a disorderly disruption in the marketplace. Which means that regulators would likely resort to a bailout when the chips are down.

The higher credit ratings make it cheaper for the banks to borrow—which means that the US taxpayer is essentially subsidizing them with an implicit guarantee. This is worth billions to the banks

It also means that the banks are likely less financially sound than their credit costs would make them appear to be—because bond buyers don’t have to be as vigilant about risks. In short, they’re our new Fannie Maes and Freddie Macs.

Moody's gives both Bank of America [BAC Loading... () ] and Citigroup [C Loading... () ] a C-minus in terms of their financial strength. That would get their senior bonds rating of Baa2 without government support. Because of government support, Bank of America senior debt is rated A2—five notches higher—and Citi’s is rated A3—four notches higher. Wells Fargo [WFC Loading... () ] gets a C-plus rating for its financial strength, which would give its debt a rating of A2. Because of the presumption of government support, it gets a three notch boost up to Aa2.

It’s not just these three banks that Moody’s rates more highly on the assumption of government. Moody’s says the it assumes the government will support Bank of New York Mellon, JPMorgan Chase [JPM Loading... () ], Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and State Street.

Net

Moody's Reveals Huge Taxpayer Subsidy for Banks

RELATED LINKS