Go Symbol Lookup
Loading...

Adobe Outlook: EPS of 29 to 35 Cents vs. Expectations of 35 Cents

Not All Risks Addressed in Stress Tests: Sheila Bair

 Text Size  
Published: Wednesday, 14 Mar 2012 | 6:09 PM ET
By: | Special to CNBC.com

The Federal Reserve's bank stress test results showed banks are stronger but didn't detail all the risks to investors, Sheila Bair told CNBC Wednesday.

ATM

"It's good for the market to have that information" about individual banks and their ability to withstand a financial downturn but "analysts and investors should do their own due diligence. Our regulators are not infallible," said the former head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

All but four of the banks that were tested passed. The test covered a worst-case financial scenario that would include a 13 percent jobless rate, a 50-percent drop in stock prices and a 21-percent decline in housing prices. The passing banks had to have capital ratios of at least 5 percent.

Bair said the Fed's assumptions on housing-related losses should be looked at very carefully, and that certain risks were not factored in such as liquidity risk and interest-rate risk — what would happen if the Federal Reserve raises interest rates again?

"I still think we need to be somewhat cautious here, especially with banks. They are stronger but in terms of capital distribution, the Fed and the regulators seem to be very cautious to insure the capital cushions remain strong," she added.

She still favors breaking up the big banks to "unlock better shareholder value" by creating "easier to understand pieces."

Sheila Bair on Banks, Economy & Oversight
Sheila Bair, former FDIC chair, says stress tests are good, but they cannot substitute capital rules. She also explains why money market funds remain at risk and require more oversight, with CNBC's Maria Bartiromo.

"I don't sense Washington will force them to break up but I do think the Fed and the FDIC have the legal authority to require them to simplify and rationalize their legal structures," she said. "That would at least make them easier to understand and easier to resolve if they do at some point fail down the road."

She doesn't think banks should be treated like heavily-regulated utilities, "but they need to be allowed to fail, and people who invest in them need to know their money is at risk when they do get into trouble."

She favors higher capital requirements along the line of the Basel III global requirements.

"I think hard and fast capital rules applied to everyone along the line of Basel III... [are] very important to reduce a risk of a failure and help protect us all down the road if we get into another down cycle," Bair said.

 Print
The latest stress test results showed banks are stronger but didn't detail all the risks to investors, Sheila Bair, the former head of the FDIC, told CNBC.

   
Comments

 

More Comments

 
 

Add Comments

 

Your Comments (Up to 1100 characters):

Remaining characters

Your comments have not been posted yet.

Please review your submission to make sure you are comfortable with your entry.

Your Comments:


                
            
            
        

Featured

U.S. Video

  • CNBC's Sharon Epperson discusses the day's activity in the commodities markets. Oil extended its run today, while metals took it on the chin. Traders are watching Bernanke for indications that he'll taper sooner rather than later.

  • Check out "The Power Summit" this Thursday, June 20th, on Power Lunch. CNBC will host investment leaders from 5 big Wall Street firms and answer the question: Where is Wall Street headed in the second half? This Thursday at 1pm ET.

  • Former KPMG auditor Scott London says he made about $70,000 in the insider trading scheme, and plans to plead guilty to securities fraud, reports CNBC's Jane Wells.