Asia markets mixed; Hong Kong's Hang Seng stays in bear market

Asia markets were mixed on Tuesday as Hong Kong's Hang Seng index ended the trading day in bear territory for the second day.

The White House announced on Monday night that it was in the process of coordinating a second meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

In the Greater China markets, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index closed lower by 0.71 percent at 26,425.56 as the market remained in bear territory for the second day after dropping by more than 20 percent from its highs in January 2018.

Over on the mainland, the Shanghai composite lost its earlier gains to close 0.18 percent lower at around 2,664.80 while the Shenzhen composite climbed 0.172 percent to end at approximately 1,409.34.

The Nikkei 225 extended its gains to end the trading day up by 1.3 percent at 22,664.69. South Korea's Kospi, on the other hand, closed 0.24 percent lower at 2,283.2.

Down Under, the ASX 200 closed higher by 0.62 percent at 6,179.7, as the financial sector rose by 0.85 percent.

*NIKKEI Nikkei 225 Index 20957.92 -669.42 -3.10
*HSI Hang Seng Index 28587.57 -525.79 -1.81
*ASX 200 S&P/ASX 200 6132.20 -63.00 -1.02
*SHANGHAI Shanghai 3066.02 -38.13 -1.23
*KOSPI KOSPI Index 2148.36 -38.59 -1.76
*CNBC 100 CNBC 100 ASIA IDX 7904.03 -145.98 -1.81

Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq snapped a four-day losing streak to close higher stateside. The S&P 500 rose by 0.2 percent to 2,877.13 while the Nasdaq Composite was up by 0.3 percent to 7,924.16. The Dow Jones Industrial Average , however, fell by 59.47 points to close at 25,857.07.

On Monday, the White House announced that Trumphad received a request from North Korea's Kim for a follow-up meeting after their historic meetingin Singapore in June 2018.

Described by the White House as a "very warm, positive letter," press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders informed reporters at the press briefing on Monday that the administration was open to the request and was "already in the process of coordinating" the meeting.

Trade also remains another focal point for markets, with Canada and the U.S. yet to secure a deal that would replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Trump announced last Friday that he was ready to slap tariffs on an additional $267 billion of Chinese imports, on top of the $200 billion already in the administration's sights.

In currency markets, the U.S. dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of currencies, was at 94.931 as of 3:41 p.m. HK/SIN, slipping further from its earlier high.

The Japanese yen weakened further against the dollar at 111.53, while the Australian dollar recovered from its earlier losses to trade higher by around 0.1 percent to 0.7121 as of 3:42 p.m. HK/SIN.

Oil markets saw further gains in afternoon trade in Asia. Global benchmark Brent crude futures contract was up by 0.61 percent at $77.84 per barrel. U.S. crude futures were also slightly up by around 0.24 percent at $67.7 per barrel.

The impending U.S. sanctions on Iran in November remain in focus for oil markets, as Washington urged other countries to switch away from buying Tehran's crude exports.

"We opine that market-watchers may continue to monitor potential supply surges, especially from Saudi Arabia and Russia, which in turn are effective in cushioning the production shortfall from Iran," said OCBC Treasury Research in a morning note, commenting on the oil market.

Some analysts, however, say the shortfall in supply caused by the sanctions on Iran may not be easily replaced.

"Frankly, the Russians can't produce more, and the Saudis immediately can only produce half a million barrels per day more," said Fereidun Fesharaki, founder and chairman of consultancy Facts Global Energy.

The Russians and Saudis "will be price takers," and the higher oil prices "will only be blamed on the Trump administration," he told CNBC on Tuesday.

Asked if U.S. shale oil could potentially cushion the impact of the sanctions, Fesharaki said the sector is already producing at its maximum capability and would have "zero impact."

"It's a fallacy to believe that U.S. shale can fill the Iran void," he said.

— CNBC's Fred Imbert and Christina Wilkie contributed to this report.

Click to show more