- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- Eyeing the Growth at CBS
- Is Oprah Ready to Go on Her OWN?
- Time Warner Cable's Earnings Drop But Beat Expectations
- Scripps Networks Interactive Buys Stake in Travel Channel
- News Corp Emerging From Bottom of Cycle: Murdoch
- Time Warner Raises Forecast, Focuses on Exploiting Content
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Jobless Rate to Hit 10.5%, Keeping Fed in Box: Poll
- AIG Moving Toward Repaying Bailout: Moody's
- Home Prices Sank Further In Most Parts of US in 3rd Quarter
- Health-Care Reform Does Little To Contain Costs: Analysts
- 'Peak Oil' Closer Than IEA Forecasts Show: Report
- News Corp. May Pull Content From Google Searches
- Pociask: In The Electronics War Does The Consumer Really Win?
- Trader Tax Sound Off
- If Mickey Mouse Has to Change—What Does That Say About You?
- Nov. 10: S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Playing Activision and Other Video Game Stocks: Analyst
- Expect 'At Least' Another 10-15% Upside: Fund Manager
- If Mickey Mouse Has to Change—What Does That Say About You?
- Nov. 10: S&P Stocks Trading at New 52-Week Highs
- Passive Job Search Strategies
- Back Off, Regulators!
- America Is On Sale
- Warren Buffett and the Crisis: 'Brilliant Moves Interspersed with Some Surprising Errors'
- Schork Oil Outlook: More Strength in Crude
- Home Prices Decline Further In Most Parts of US
- Jobless Rate to Hit 10.5%, Keeping Fed in Box: Poll
- Credit Card Firms Squeeze Customers as Rules Loom
- 'Thriller' Art: Warhol's Jackson Work Could Net $700,000
- Health Reform Does Little to Contains Costs: Analysts
- Ponzi Proceeds: Bidding on Madoff's Toys
- Trustee Seeks Billions for Madoff Investors
- Quiz: Do You Know Your Coca-Cola Myths?
- New Lows for Stocks Next Year: Equities Bear
Media Money
![]() |
AP Philippe Dauman |
Viacom's Paramount Pictures acquired DreamWorks for about $1.6 billion, closing the deal in early 2006. Now Spielberg and Geffen's deals expire in late 2008. While they probably wouldn't be able to take DreamWorks' name with them, they'd be taking the company's brain trust.
Is Dauman bluffing? Certainly the powerhouses' presence at Paramount is not immaterial. Paramount itself is in the midst of an impressive turnaround but DreamWorks was involved in all its strongest films so far this year. This spring "Norbit," "Blades of Glory," and "Disturbia," all big hits, all came from DreamWorks. And "Transformers" was a huge success--a joint venture between DreamWorks and Paramount.
Dauman may have been exaggerating about how little they need Spielberg and Geffen, but he is smart to start planning for a different kind of company without them around. Does he think that in this new credit crunch environment it'd be hard for the duo to get film financing? Even if the hedge funds pull back their financing, there will always be another group of investors wanting to pour money into movies, especially those from the DreamWorks team.
Questions? Comments?










