More Videos
- Out with Cox, in with Uptick Rule
- Pops & Drops: Hewlett-Packard, JP Morgan & Air Wagoner
- Mad Money Green Week: Owens Corning
- Fast & Furious: It's All About Soup
- Web Extra: The Trade on Walmart and RIMM
- Chartology: Grossly Oversold and Favoring the Upside
- The "Armageddon" Gameplan
- What's Next for Citigroup?
- What to Expect From a Geithner-led Treasury
- Soros: More Money Needed For U.S. Bailout
- HP Earnings: How Much Will "Hurt" From Economy?
- Obama Warns On Economy: Works On Stimulus Plan
- Citigroup's Ills May Signal Market Isn't Near Bottom
- US Inflation Bonds Hit by Deflation, May Recover
- Pros Say: Market Will Drop 5-10% — Ford Will Boom
- Bonds Drop on Profit-Taking, Geithner Move
- Jack Welch on Detroit: Let Them Go Bankrupt
- Bank Shareholders Face 'the Unthinkable': El-Erian
Text Size 
The Oscars are just around the corner--this Sunday night--but many people are buzzing that they don't seem as big of a deal this year. Well, they are still a big deal in Hollywood, and their slightly lower profile makes a lot of sense this year. For one thing, the writers' strike put the fate of the Oscars in jeopardy.
If the strike hadn't resolved itself in time, the Academy Awards could have become a glorified press conference, like the Golden Globes. So that meant the studios didn't pull out the stops started hyping their Oscar fare until closer to the event than usual.
But marketers have been on board for a while. Considered 'the Super Bowl for women' there are few TV events that reach out to such a mass audience. And this year's event--the 80th annual Academy Awards--will bring in more millions for ABC [DIS
Loading...
()
] than ever. ABC is charging 7 percent more per 30-second spot than last year, some $1.82 million, putting ABC's total take at over $85 million.
But will as many people be watching this year? That depends if people watch because they've seen one of the best picture nominees. This year's Oscar nominees are more on the artsy end, a far cry from the commercial fare like "Titanic" and "Chicago" that topped the Oscar list in years past. One frontrunner for best picture is "No Country for Old Men," a violent drama which brought in just over $60 million at the domestic box office.
related content |
Period drama "Atonement" (beautiful, but quite sad at the end) brought in just under $50 million in the U.S. "There Will be Blood," which is certain to win numerous awards, brought in just $30 million. And "Michael Clayton"--the George Clooney vehicle that rails against corporate malpractice--has a ton of exposure thanks to a Clooney and Warner Bros' [TWX
Loading...
()
] marketing effort that catches my eye on nearly every street corner in LA. But its U.S. box office take was just under $50 million. So the rundown reads: Murder ("No Country"), thwarted love ("Atonement"), oil mining and family cruelty ("Blood") and corporate malfeasance ("Clayton"). Perhaps it's no surprise this fare didn't attract the kind of massive audience that goes to see "Spider Man" or "Pirates of the Caribbean."
The best picture nominee with the most critical success is "Juno," a low budget movie that brought in a whopping $125 million in the U.S. alone, which could have a surprise "Little Miss Sunshine"-esque win. The question is whether some of these lower box office movies will affect the viewership of the show itself. My guess? Probably not.
Questions? Comments?
Del.icio.us
Digg It
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes