- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
- What to Expect From Disney Earnings?
- Ahead of Earnings Disney Restructures Studio
- Murdoch Lashes Out At Google
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
- My Exclusive Interview With Bob Iger
- Activision Blizzard's "Modern Warfare 2" Sales Break Records
- Disney's CFO-Theme Park Chairman Executive Swap
- What to Expect From Disney Earnings?
- Ahead of Earnings Disney Restructures Studio
- Murdoch Lashes Out At Google
- Why Google is Paying $750 Million for Ad Mob
- Modern Warfare 2's Record-Breaking Launch
- Food Network, HGTV Drive Scripps Networks' Upside Surprise
- Disney's 'Carol' Tests Widest 3-D Release Ever
RSS FEED
MOST SHARED
- Seeking Innovation in Health Care
- Cramer: 5 Earnings Reports to Watch Next Week
- Downturn is Prime Time for Airport Infrastructure Projects
- Driving Health Care Innovation
- Next Week’s Top IPO
- Hedge Fund Billionaire Paulson Reports New Citi Stake
- Has Twitter's Finest Hours (Seconds) Come and Gone?
- Gold Rises, Nears Record High as Dollar Drops
- Microsoft's Bill Gates Praises Apple's Steve Jobs For 'Saving the Company'
- Warren Buffett and Bill Gates: Keeping America Great
- Dollar is Not Plunging—So 'Calm Down': Market Strategist
- Strategists Say Markets Have More Upside — But How Much?
- Hirschhorn: Risk-Averse Traders
- Roginsky: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Financial Reform
- This Year's Biggest Thanksgiving Leftover: Cash
- TV Series Inks Unique Deal For Fight
- First Time Buyers Rescue Housing: Realtors
- Dollar General Trades Higher After Its IPO
- Fed Reform? Not So Fast.
- Oil Next Week: What Traders Will Be Watching

- Hedge Fund Billionaire Paulson Reports New Citi Stake
- Cramer: 5 Earnings Reports to Watch Next Week
- Court Rejects 'Clawbacks' for Alleged Stanford Victims
- Tax Credit Sparking First-Time Home Sales: Realtors
- Investors Cut Back US Stocks for Bigger Growth Abroad
- Cities With the Most Home Price Reductions
- White House Plans to Freeze Spending to Cut Deficit
- This Year's Biggest Thanksgiving Leftover: Cash
- Oil Next Week: What Traders Will Be Watching
Media Money
![]() |
CNBC.com |
With shareholders concerned about the company's [NYT
Loading...
()
] dissapointing earnings miss announced last week, company chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. kicked off the meeting with an impassioned speech -- trying to convince shareholders that the company is becoming as sleek and modern as the wood, steel, glass and tangerine-colored walls they'd passed through to hear his remarks. (This my analysis, not Sulzberger's.)
Sulzberger started off by dispelling rumors that the company could be bought or taken private, insisting that the company "is not for sale" and that it'll continue operating in its current structure for the unforeseeable future.
He attributed the company's recent shortfall partly to the economic downturn and industry-wide pressures, but he insisted that beneath all those negative numbers the company is adapting and changing far better than it appears.
Sulzberger whipped out all sorts of numbers illustrating the company's online growth, laying out a strategy for cutting costs while increasing the company's products, like the "T" style magazine, which always seems to be the go-to example of a new venture that's snagging ad dollars...
One big issue on today's meeting agenda: electing two new board members who represent the two hedge funds, Harbinger Capital and Firebrand Partners, which now own 20 percent of the company's shares. The company leadership's decision to support two of their representatives for the board is part of a compromise to end a proxy battle the hedge fund folks were waging.
Can the New York Times Co. turn itself around? The shareholders I spoke to en route into the meeting were optimistic that this new blood on the board would impose a new discipline, perhaps pushing the company to sell its less-profitable papers and non-core divisions.
I was in an on-air debate along with our Dennis Kneale and Vanity Fair's Michael Wolff, with Wolff arguing that the publishing industry is dead. While the business is certainly challenged and changing, I have to disagree with him on one key point: companies like the Times are big content creators, and while the monetization model may change, the business of producing content will remain key.
Questions? Comments?










