Clouding the G-7 gathering, which represents the world's major industrial economies, are the tit-for-tat tariffs between Washington and Beijing.Politicsread more
The Goldman Sachs technology M&A team, led by Sam Britton, has cashed in on its software focus and decades of experience to dominate 2019's biggest deals.Technologyread more
American small and medium-size companies that rely on China are scrambling to adjust their business plans in response to the escalating trade war.Traderead more
Here are the products that stand to be the most affected by China's new tariffs on $75 billion worth of U.S. goods.Marketsread more
The summit comes amid fears over a global economic slowdown, and U.S. tensions over trade allies, Iran and Russia.Politicsread more
Carl Medlock used to work at Tesla. Now he's one of the few people in the U.S. that can fix the company's original Roadster electric vehicles.Technologyread more
The world's second biggest economy is past a point where it cannot ignore its enormous debt anymore, according to an analyst.China Economyread more
Trump does have some powerful tools that would not require approval from U.S. Congress.Politicsread more
Stocks dropped after Donald Trump ordered that U.S. manufacturers find alternatives to their operations in China.US Marketsread more
As demand for lab monkeys continues to rise, U.S. scientists are reporting delays in research projects because they can't obtain enough animals, according to the National...Politicsread more
The European Union will respond in kind if the U.S. imposes tariffs on France over digital tax plan, EU chief Donald Tusk told G-7.Technologyread more
If only it were true.
From the moment I saw the headlines, they didn't pass the smell test: "More than half of tech hires this year are women." As someone who's spent most of the last 15 years covering the tech industry in one form or another, I know how drastically the workforce skews male. So for the trend to have changed in a year? It would be a watershed event.
The headlines seemed to be based on data...and from a great source: the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This was my first red flag, though. Government data is plentiful, and really easy to misinterpret by those of us who aren't used to digging into it. And, well, we in the tech press tend to fall into that category.
So I waded into the data, carefully. What did I find? There's that line the character Inigo Montoya says in "The Princess Bride": "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." In this case, the data does not say what they think it says.
The original report on tech hiring mostly women this year came from Dice, a respected tech employment site. It summarized the data in this graphic.
The numbers Dice used come from a category called "Computer Systems Design and Related Services." The problem with that is, "Computer Systems Design and Related Services" is not an occupational category at all. Occupational categories are listed at the bottom of this Bureau of Labor Statistics release.
No, "Computer Systems Design and Related Services" is an industry category, as the census site explains here.
What kinds of firms are in that category? Mostly the type that do contract information technology work.
So what the data is really saying is that a certain TYPE of business that falls under the category "Computer Systems Design and Related Services" happened to hire more women than men this year, in a slow year for hiring.
That doesn't mean the women hired by these companies were "in tech" by any means. They could have been in sales, in public relations, in customer service. They probably were. The majority of employees in firms in this category aren't technical.
A Bureau of Labor statistics spokesman confirmed that there is no way to determine whether women are making gains in tech employment by looking at the Computer Systems Design and Related Services industry category.
Unfortunately, quite a few outlets picked up the Dice report and are repeating the idea that tech has suddenly (if temporarily) solved its gender imbalance problem. I don't have the data either way, but my gut—and my eyes—tell me that's probably not anywhere near the case.
—By CNBC's Jonathan Fortt. Follow him on Twitter