Investors largely expected the FOMC to cut rates by a quarter point.The Fedread more
The lack of clarity surrounding the U.S.-China trade war is what's really hitting global growth, says ex- Deputy Treasury Secretary Sarah Bloom Raskin.World Economyread more
China's economy has long relied on factors such high levels of investments and an expanding labor force for growth. Those growth drivers are running out of steam.China Economyread more
India could benefit from the fallout in the U.S.-China trade war, experts told CNBC — but much-needed reforms on land and labor could prove to be a challenge for companies...Asia Economyread more
New crash tests show the Tesla Model 3 and the Audi e-tron, are among the safest models out on the road. The results bolster the theory electric vehicles may be better...Autosread more
U.S. consumers and growth in sectors such as technology have offset declines in other American industries, says Tom Finke, chairman and CEO of investment management firm...US Economyread more
The FAA administrator's comments come on the eve of his visit to Boeing facilities outside Seattle. While there, he's scheduled to meet with Boeing executives and be briefed...Airlinesread more
Last weekend's attacks on oil facilities — and the spike in crude prices that followed — should show that the world needs to stop relying on oil, says Helen Clark.Energyread more
The photo depicts Canadian leader Justin Trudeau wearing a turban and robe, with dark makeup on his hands, face and neck. Liberal Party spokesman confirms the photo is of...Electionsread more
As the Fed was meeting to consider cutting interest rates, it lost control of the very benchmark rate that it manages.Market Insiderread more
CBS, CNN and other major media companies are starting to pull e-cigarette advertising off their airways, as the death toll from a mysterious vaping-related illness continues...Health and Scienceread more
Having cancer is bad enough. And the lifetime consequences have been well-documented — a higher risk of other cancers, heart disease and general weakness from the treatment.
Now a new federal study shows there's a financial burden too — on average, $4,000 a year for men and $3,000 for women over and above what people who haven't had cancer spend.
And that's just direct medical costs. Cancer survivors also have thousands in lost productivity, from having to cut work hours or even quit their jobs, the report finds.
With more than 13 million cancer survivors in the U.S. now, that's a lot of money.
"Cancer survivors face physical, emotional, psychosocial, employment and financial challenges as a result of their cancer diagnosis and treatment," said Donatus Ekwueme, a senior health economist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who worked on the report.
"With the number of cancer survivors expected to increase by more than 30 percent in the next decade — to 18 million Americans — medical and public health professionals must be diligent in their efforts to help reduce the burden of cancer on survivors and their families."
To calculate the costs, a team from CDC, the National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society and elsewhere looked at data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's 2008-2011 survey on medical spending.
"From 2008 to 2011, male cancer survivors incurred average annual medical expenditures of approximately $8,000 per person and per capita productivity loss of $3,700," they wrote.
"For females, the estimates were $8,400 for annual medical expenditures and $4,000 for per capita productivity loss. Among men, these estimates were nearly two times higher and for women they were one-and-half times higher than among persons without a cancer history."
They found nearly 32 percent of cancer survivors had to limit usual daily activities outside of work because of cancer and 42 percent had to make changes to their work hours and duties.
"The results of this analysis indicate that overall, cancer survivors had total annual medical expenditures estimated at $4,187 more for males and $3,293 more for females, compared with those of persons without a cancer history," they wrote.
Thirty percent could not return to work at all. Others may have been forced to. "These survivors might be returning to work to maintain adequate health insurance coverage and to pay for cancer-related services not covered by insurance," the report reads.
A second, unrelated study found that childhood cancer survivors are 52 percent more likely to be hospitalized than similar children who have not had cancer.
"Our findings demonstrate that survivors of child and adolescent cancer require better strategies to prevent, manage and treat conditions before they become severe enough to require hospitalization," Anne Kirchhoff of the University of Utah and colleagues wrote in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.
—By Maggie Fox, NBC News