The lack of clarity surrounding the U.S.-China trade war is what's really hitting global growth, says ex- Deputy Treasury Secretary Sarah Bloom Raskin.World Economyread more
As the Fed was meeting to consider cutting interest rates, it lost control of the very benchmark rate that it manages.Market Insiderread more
China's economy has long relied on factors such high levels of investments and an expanding labor force for growth. Those growth drivers are running out of steam.China Economyread more
India could benefit from the fallout in the U.S.-China trade war, experts told CNBC — but much-needed reforms on land and labor could prove to be a challenge for companies...Asia Economyread more
New crash tests show the Tesla Model 3 and the Audi e-tron, are among the safest models out on the road. The results bolster the theory electric vehicles may be better...Autosread more
U.S. consumers and growth in sectors such as technology have offset declines in other American industries, says Tom Finke, chairman and CEO of investment management firm...US Economyread more
The FAA administrator's comments come on the eve of his visit to Boeing facilities outside Seattle. While there, he's scheduled to meet with Boeing executives and be briefed...Airlinesread more
Last weekend's attacks on oil facilities — and the spike in crude prices that followed — should show that the world needs to stop relying on oil, says Helen Clark.Energyread more
The photo depicts Canadian leader Justin Trudeau wearing a turban and robe, with dark makeup on his hands, face and neck. Liberal Party spokesman confirms the photo is of...Electionsread more
CBS, CNN and other major media companies are starting to pull e-cigarette advertising off their airways, as the death toll from a mysterious vaping-related illness continues...Health and Scienceread more
The U.S. Federal Reserve on Wednesday cut its overnight rate by 25 basis points to a range of 1.75% to 2%, a move that was widely expected. The central bank, however, appeared...Asia Marketsread more
The ouster of the entire 12-person board of directors last week at Darden Restaurants could trigger alarm bells at other companies where executives have ignored the demands of increasingly vocal shareholders, corporate governance experts say.
"It's a warning that you've got to take into account the concerns of shareholders," said Charles Elson, professor of finance and director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. "There's an election process and this can happen again—at any company."
Darden Restaurants shareholders voted on Friday to elect all 12 board nominees recommended by Starboard Value and remove the existing directors. The vote brought to an end a prolonged fight between Darden and two activist funds, Starboard and Barington Capital Group. Earlier this year, former Darden CEO Clarence Otis announced his resignation in the midst of the battle with the activists.
Starboard had urged the company to take several steps that management resisted, such as spinning off Darden's real estate into a separate vehicle and splitting in half the company, which owns the Olive Garden chain.
Instead, Darden's management sold its Red Lobster division without putting the matter to a shareholder vote. The sale stirred up ire among some shareholders because it was allegedly designed to prevent the activists from getting their way and generated a meager amount of money.
"The problem was that management kept spitting in the activists' faces," said Jill Fisch, a law professor specializing in corporate governance at the University of Pennsylvania. "Management was saying 'we don't care what you want.'"
A Darden spokeman declined to comment to CNBC.com. However, in a statement Friday, outgoing Darden board director Charles A. Ledsinger Jr. said, "We are extremely grateful to Darden Restaurants' talented and dedicated management and employees who, day after day, serve our customers with distinction and are the backbone of what makes Darden the pre-eminent casual dining company."
Investment bankers say it has become very common for activists to approach management before waging a public campaign. The victory of the activists at a company as large as Darden, which has a market capitalization of $6 billion, could encourage companies to negotiate with activists rather than take the chance of going to battle with them.
"People are going to wake up to the fact that there's a serious risk that you're going to lose the entire board," Fisch said. "If an activist has an idea, maybe sit down and have the conversation."
Public activism has reached unprecedented levels as more money flows into hedge funds that focus on the strategy. Activist funds have $93 billion under management, with $14 billion in inflows so far this year, according to research firm eVestment.
While Darden was an usually large company to see its entire board replaced, others have given up seats to activist investors in recent months. In August, Sandell Asset Management won four board seats on the 12-member board of restaurant chain Bob Evans.
Aside from hedge funds, there are other potential winners in an environment with more activism: investment banks and law firms that advise companies that come under fire. Goldman Sachs advised Darden while Lazard advised Bob Evans. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz served as legal advisor to both Darden and Bob Evans.
Neither Goldman, Lazard, nor Wachtell immediately responded to requests for comment from CNBC.com.
Darden's ousted board members also face a pending lawsuit related to the sale of Red Lobster earlier this year. The suit alleges that Darden misled shareholders when it said publicly that Red Lobster's business was in decline and needed to be sold.