Investors are rushing into the relative safe haven of the bond market, causing the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury to plummet.Real Estateread more
President Donald Trump on Thursday directed the U.S. intelligence community to "quickly and fully cooperate" with Attorney General William Barr's investigation into the...Politicsread more
The U.S. Commerce Department said its proposed rule would amend the normal countervailing duty process to include new criteria for currency undervaluation.World Economyread more
Asia Pacific markets traded mixed on Friday morning as investors remained worried over trade tensions between the United States and China.Asia Marketsread more
Wall Street is becoming convinced that both the White House and Beijing are willing to engage in a protracted trade war that could begin to hit consumers and slow global...Market Insiderread more
Stocks fell sharply on Thursday as investors started to fear the U.S.-China trade war is slowing the economy.Marketsread more
"The last thing I want is to put a date out there for lifting the grounding," said Dan Elwell, acting administrator for the FAA.Transportationread more
The charges allege he published secret documents obtained by former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, some of which included the disclosure of foreigners who were...Politicsread more
TransferWise, the money transfer start-up, was valued at $3.5 billion after investors bought $292 million of shares in a secondary sale.Technologyread more
See which stocks are posting big moves after the bell on Thursday, May 23.Market Insiderread more
Sentiment is "not negative enough to trigger a huge rally ... unless we get some kind of real breakthrough with China," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
I followed with excitement Congress' efforts to pass legislation in 2008 and 2010 to maintain and upgrade the crumbling U.S. infrastructure. Such infrastructure investment would have generated needed jobs while assisting economic activity for many years to come. But Congress failed to pass that legislation. This greatly disappointed me and many others in the business and investing world, because such investments are critical to supporting a healthy and expanding economy.
Some may have objected to such funding because they equate it with "stimulus spending;" considering it to offer no sustainable benefit and to increase the federal deficit. But infrastructure investment—unlike stimulus spending, which gives benefits only during the time during which funds are spent—would generate, every year for decades, increased economic activity, higher incomes, and greater tax revenues. That revenue would be sufficient to not only pay back the debt initially incurred with interest, but to also generate profit. Once begun, long-lived projects can also create expectations of more economic activity and buoy business and consumer confidence.
Thus, maintaining and upgrading our country's crumbling infrastructure should be among any candidate's highest domestic priorities—but which candidate in this presidential election has the best chance to make this happen? So far, only Hillary Clinton has offered a comprehensive proposal to address this critical issue. Only Mrs. Clinton has committed to submitting that proposal to Congress within the first hundred days in office. But here's the tougher question: which candidate is the best person to get the job done? Here are two key considerations to help us decide:
1) Which of the candidates would more likely fight against the wrongheaded Washington thinking that refuses to allow investment in maintaining our infrastructure, and insist on making such investment a cornerstone of domestic policy?
2) Which of the candidates, if president, would more likely work productively with Congress to enact legislation that supports infrastructure investment?
I do not yet support any candidate, and as a registered Independent in New York, I was not permitted to vote in either primary. However, I know that Mr. Trump has a successful track record building projects and that he mentions in speeches the need to upgrade our infrastructure even if he has not yet offered a written proposal.
Were Mr. Trump to develop a comprehensive proposal to address this critical domestic need, I believe he could, at the very least, challenge Mrs. Clinton on her infrastructure and job-creating credentials. He could even possibly hijack this key domestic policy issue from Mrs. Clinton and claim it as his own, because many voters may consider such a proposal from a builder like Mr. Trump to be even more credible.
Were Mr. Trump to also fight tenaciously for his proposal against anti-investment groups including Tea Party Republicans, he would, in my view, expand his overall appeal.
We in the U.S. have, in this election, an historic opportunity to help ensure greater job growth and higher incomes. We just have to identify and choose the candidate with the grit to make real growth happen.
Clarence Schwab is founder and managing partner of Schwab Capital Management, an investment and advisory firm focused on publicly traded and smaller privately held companies. His writings have appeared in the New York Times, the Financial Times, and The Hill. He earned a B.A. from Columbia University and a M.B.A. from The Harvard Business School.