These are the stocks posting the largest moves before the bell.Market Insiderread more
May had failed to win a parliamentary majority on Britain's withdrawal from the European Union.Europe Politicsread more
Analyst Michael Olson says he has "a high degree of confidence" that Amazon shares can reach the level without "significant changes to the business."Investingread more
Special counsel Robert Mueller wants to talk to Congress about his investigation into the Trump campaign and Russian interference in the 2016 election, but he wants to do it...Politicsread more
The biggest U.S. gasoline price surge in years is running out of steam just in time for the start of the summer driving season.Energyread more
Breaking up the social network won't lead to better data protection, said former Facebook executive Chris Kelly.Technologyread more
A downgrade from BMO analysts led to an unsavory drop in Chipotle's stock, and some analysts are advising waiting out the weakness.Trading Nationread more
Investors are rushing into the relative safe haven of the bond market, causing the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury to plummet.Real Estateread more
Sears opens its first Home & Life stores and plans to open more as it looks for a fresh start after bankruptcy.Retailread more
New orders for U.S.-made capital goods fell more than expected in April, further evidence that manufacturing and the broader economy were slowing.Economyread more
China denounced U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo for fabricating rumors after he said the chief executive of China's Huawei was lying about his company's ties to the...World Politicsread more
Wall Street banks have enough cash on hand to keep the Fed happy — this year, at least.
The 33 banks met or exceeded regulators' required capital cushions they would need to offset losses, according to the Federal Reserve, which on Thursday released the first portion of its annual stress test results.
Banks had to project greater losses this time around, including $113 billion in trading losses for the eight biggest firms.
The tests require banks to calculate how their holdings would fare in the event of various scenarios, including rising unemployment and a "severe global recession." They're required to apply those events to their holdings, testing whether their balance sheets would stand up to another economic crisis. The Federal Reserve began administering the tests in the wake of the global financial crisis, which began to gain momentum in 2007, and part of its plans include tweaking tests annually to ensure that individual Wall Street firms can weather deteriorating credit scenarios and market turbulence.
Still, the banks' stress test headaches may be back with a vengeance next year. Some Federal Reserve governors reportedly said they expect to raise capital requirements, which would add to the burden those financial institutions face as they prepare responses to the annual regulatory exams.
"The changes we make in each year's stress scenarios allow supervisors, investors and the public to assess the resiliency of the banking firms in different adverse economic circumstances," Governor Daniel Tarullo said in a statement. "This feature is key to a sound stress testing regime, since the nature of possible future stress episodes is inherently uncertain."
Banks may be sweating next year's stress tests, in which they could be pushed to further broaden capital cushions by regulators, but the immediate hurdle for Wall Street firms and international banks will come next week, when the Federal Reserve announces which institutions passed or failed the qualitative part of their exams. Bank officials have previously complained that the qualitative portion tends to be subjective, meaning that regulators' rejection of a bank's capital planning or stress testing preparedness could come on grounds the company feels are arbitrary.
Not that it lessens the blow to banks, if they fail. Missing the mark on stress tests may mean that a bank would have to put off things like dividends and buybacks until regulators are satisfied with their strategy.
"If you get dinged on the qualitative [test], there's nothing you can do," said Ernie Patrikis, a partner at law firm White & Case. "The shareholders will not be happy."