A quarter of the S&P 500 companies report earnings next week, and that could buffet the market as investors await the July Fed meeting.Market Insiderread more
Iran's Revolutionary Guard claims a British tanker it still holds, Stena Impero, failed to follow international maritime rules.World Newsread more
Amazon hires Trump-allied lobbyist Jeff Miller as battle for Pentagon contract heats up.Politicsread more
In a series of tweets, the president addressed an unusual controversy stemming from a speech delivered Thursday by New York Fed President John Williams.Marketsread more
"You need to understand that we're about to embark on the busiest week of the year for industrial earnings," CNBC's Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
Boston Federal Reserve President Eric Rosengren is lining up against an apparent push to cut interest rates, telling CNBC in an interview Friday that the central bank can...The Fedread more
The MTA reported that the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 trains are all facing delays due to a network communications issue impacting service in both directions, NBC New York reports.Transportationread more
Companies aren't waiting for the U.S.-China trade war to be resolved, says the head of the world's biggest money manager.Investingread more
US officials including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow will host a meeting at the White House on Monday of semiconductor and...Technologyread more
Trump's constant berating of the Fed and its actions does not influence the central bank's decisions, Boston Fed's Eric Rosengren says.The Fedread more
The lawsuits allege J&J's talc-based baby powder contained asbestos and caused ovarian and other cancers.Health and Scienceread more
The Democratic platform laid out some of the party's main talking points for the general election, but also included one that may seem unusual, even bizarre, to some.
The 55-page platform said that a Hillary Clinton administration would work to let the U.S. Postal Service offer "basic financial services," including cashing checks and giving USPS more flexibility in choosing with services it provides, in an effort to revitalize the government service.
Harry Holzer, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University, said the reasoning behind this may be "it's the one institution that kind of exists everywhere already."
He added, however, the government would have to spend money to make this work.
In the first calendar quarter of the year, USPS reported a net loss of $2.04 billion, a 38 percent increase from the year-earlier period. As of Jan. 13, the service employed a total of 625,113 people.
"You'd have to fund it. Right now, with their current budget, they can't take on an unfunded mandate," Holzer said. It's "an intriguing idea, but it would cost some money."
Granting USPS the ability to execute basic financial services, however, is not a new idea.
USPS used to take deposits from clients until 1966 and, in 1947, had nearly $3.4 billion in deposits. USPS became a popular deposit home for people who didn't have confidence in banks in the early 20th century.
"The United States Postal Service (USPS) is a national treasure. That is why Democrats embrace a vibrant, public Postal Service that offers universal service, and reject any effort to privatize or marginalize it," the Democratic platform, released July 21, said.
Earlier this year, the House introduced a bill that, if made into law, would grant USPS similar powers. In fact, the bill goes a step further and would give USPS with the ability to provide "small-dollar loans" and "services relating to international money transfers."
The Democratic platform also talked about enacting a "modernized" version of the Glass-Steagall Act. The original version, signed into law in 1933 and repealed in 1999, basically created a wall between commercial and investment banking.
"Banks should not be able to gamble with taxpayers' deposits or pose an undue risk to Main Street. Democrats support a variety of ways to stop this from happening, including an updated and modernized version of Glass-Steagall as well as breaking up too-big-to-fail financial institutions that pose a systemic risk to the stability of our economy," the Democratic platform said, but did not provide details about how it would differ from the original law.
CNBC reached out to the Clinton campaign, but did not receive an immediate response.
"No one really thinks that Glass-Steagall … would've prevented the crisis of 2008. As long as the commercial banks were free to buy those securities, securities that had the [risky mortgages], it didn't matter that they were interconnected with the investment banks," Georgetown's Holzer said.
He also said that breaking up big financial institutions, another idea presented in the platform, may not have helped in preventing the crisis.
"The biggest problem with the banks in 2008 was not their size, but their interconnectedness. AIG was actually quite small; Bear Stearns was quite small. Just breaking big banks into small ones, if they engage in the same risky behavior, it doesn't necessarily solve your problem. "