Health-care companies claim they are not threatened by Amazon's potential foray into the space. A recent lawsuit suggests otherwise.Technologyread more
It wasn't supposed to be this way: The 2017 tax cut and aggressive moves toward deregulation were supposed to pull the U.S. economy out of its glacial move higher.Economyread more
The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note fell below 2% for the first time since November 2016 on Wednesday.Bondsread more
Slack pursued an unusual direct listing, meaning it did not have banks underwrite the offering.CNBC Disruptor 50read more
President Trump says Iran may not have intentionally downed an unmanned U.S. surveillance drone.Politicsread more
Slack's public market debut on Thursday will generate billions for venture firm Accel and healthy returns for Andreessen Horowitz and Social Capital.Technologyread more
The road to the Fed's policy pivot to lower interest rates began in early May, with a tweet from President Trump on trade.Market Insiderread more
See which stocks are posting big moves after the bell on June 20.Market Insiderread more
Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., said in a statement that lawyers for the Trump administration blocked Hicks from answering questions 155 times during the Wednesday hearing.Politicsread more
Jim Cramer says "you'll want to keep some powder dry so you can buy into weakness and get some real bargains."Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
CNBC analysis using Kensho found that Disney, Verizon and Home Depot were some of the best performing Dow stocks in declining-rate environments.Investingread more
You might survive going to the emergency room — but the "surprise" bill you get later could be a real killer.
A new study that looked at more than 2 million emergency department visits found that more than 1 in 5 patients who went to ERs within their health-insurance networks ended up being treated by an "out-of-network" doctor — and thus exposed to additional charges not covered by their insurance plan.
And the average out-of-network bill those patients faced, unless their insurance plan ultimately agreed to cover it, was more than $622, according to the study by two researchers from the Yale School of Public Health and the Yale School of Management.
But the bills can be much higher than that, according to the researchers, who pointed out that one patient they were aware of faced a potential balance bill of more than $19,600. On average, out-of-network emergency department doctors were paid nearly 2.7-times what in-network doctors were paid for the same services, according to the research.
"Our results are deeply troubling," wrote the authors, Zack Cooper and Fiona Scott Morton, in an article summarizing their findings in the "New England Journal of Medicine. " The authors noted that the Federal Reserve has found that almost half of all Americans could not afford to pay $400 in unexpected expenses without selling assets or borrowing money.
"Most patients with health coverage go to in-network emergency rooms and rightly expect to be treated by in-network doctors," said Cooper, assistant professor of public health and economics at the Yale School of Public Health.
"Our study shows that nearly a quarter of people who visited in-network emergency rooms were exposed to potentially major costs. This is just wrong and we must do better. People should not face financial ruin from medical bills they cannot reasonably avoid."
Health insurance plans as a rule cover most of the costs of medical services such as doctor's visits, hospital stays and tests as long as a patient uses a health-care provider within the plan's network. In return for being in a plan's network — and getting access to potential customers — providers generally agree to accept a lower payment rate for services than they would charge for out-of-network patients.
But if a patient goes to a health provider who is not in their plan's network, insurance might not cover any of the bill — or might require the patient to pay a much bigger share of the bill out-of-pocket than they would have if they had gone to an in-network provider.
The NEJM article published Wednesday notes that while hospitals generally contract with physician groups to provide care to patients who visit emergency rooms, the ER doctors, "however, contract independently with insurance companies."
"And they and the hospitals where they work may not contract with the same insurers," the authors wrote.
"As a result, patients who choose an in-network ED [emergency department] may discover later that the physician who treated them wasn't in their insurer's network," according to the authors. "The result is a large physician bill that the insurer doesn't cover or only partially covers, leaving the patient to pay the balance."
To understand how common that phenomenon is, the authors looked at claims data from a large insurer that covers tens of millions of customers, and focused on emergency department visits of adults under the age of 65 in 2014 and 2015. In all, 2.2 million emergency visits in all 50 states were looked at.
The authors found that 22 percent of the visits that occurred at an in-network hospital involved out-of-network physicians.
But that figure "masks significant geographic variation in surprise-billing rates" the authors wrote.
"In McAllen, Texas, and St. Petersburg, Florida, surprise-billing rates were 89% and 62% respectively," according to their article. "In contrast, in Boulder, Colorado, and South Bend, Indiana, the surprise-billing rate was near zero, suggesting that surprise billing is a solvable problem."
The article notes that some states, including New York, have passed laws that bar out-of-network doctors from balance billing patients who receive care at an in-network facility.
But the authors point out that New York's law, while being "one of the most ambitious to date," does not apply to people who receive health coverage from firms that self-insure. "Furthermore, patients who receive surprise bills must be aware of state protections and submit a substantial amount of paperwork to get redress."
The authors also point out that so-called hold harmless laws against balance billing "typically require the insurer to pay the full billed amount" from the out-of-network doctor.
"Although they limit additional costs for consumers, such laws create perverse incentives for providers to avoid joining networks, because they insurer must still pay the billed rate," the article says. "Insurers will ultimately pass these higher costs on to consumers in the form of higher premiums."