As China's economic growth declines, some analysts say Beijing may have to spend more on infrastructure, adding to concerns about high debts.China Economyread more
U.S. President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Washington and Beijing have a long way to go on trade, adding that America could place tariffs on an additional $325 billion...Asia Marketsread more
"The charts, as interpreted by Carley Garner, suggest that the upside in the stock market has gotten more limited," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
John Paul Stevens, who served on the Supreme Court for nearly 35 years and became its leading liberal, has died.Politicsread more
The largest U.S. banks are scrutinizing members of the Federal Reserve for any insight into how the central bank will tinker interest rates.Banksread more
The U.S. and China restarted their trade talks, but signs are showing a comprehensive deal could be a long way off, if it happens at all.Marketsread more
The WTO ruling recognized that the United States had proved that China used state-owned enterprises to subsidize and distort its economy. But the U.S. must accept Chinese...World Economyread more
Facebook's cryptocurrency project has already been met with skepticism from policymakers around the world.Technologyread more
Stone, 66, a notorious Republican political operative who has described himself as a "dirty trickster," had previously been dressed down by the judge for his public remarks...Politicsread more
Delta is gathering more data from customers than ever in hopes of avoiding customer service problems and increasing customer satisfaction, its CFO says.At Workread more
The Biden team's second-quarter Federal Election Commission filing shows that the campaign wrote a check of just over $5,300 on June 28 to Sheehan Associates for "strategic...2020 Electionsread more
Hours before a scheduled vote on a Republican bill that would repeal and replace major parts of Obamacare, a GOP congressman suggested that neither he — nor anyone else — has actually read the entire bill.
But Rep. Thomas Garrett of Virginia said his "staff" had read all of the parts of the bill — which he plans to vote for.
"Oh, gosh," Garrett said on MSNBC on Thursday morning when asked if he has read the entire text of the GOP's American Health Care Act.
"Let's put it this way: People in my office have read all parts of the bill."
"I don't think any individual has read the whole bill," Garrett said. "That's why we have staff."
Republicans for years have accused Democrats of ramming through Obamacare legislation, known as the Affordable Care Act, through Congress without lawmakers having a full grasp of the implications of that law.
They and other Obamacare foes have repeatedly pointed to a statement that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said about the ACA in 2010.
"We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it — away from the fog of the controversy," Pelosi said.
Referring to the ACA in 2009, Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said: "I don't think we should pass bills that we haven't read that we don't know what they cost."
But Ryan, who is now House speaker, and other GOP leaders on Wednesday night scheduled the vote Thursday without having in hand an analysis of their revised repeal bill by the Congressional Budget Office.
The CBO at some point will project how much the bill will cost the federal government, how it will affect insurance premiums, and how many more people are likely to become uninsured as a result of it.
"I have said all along that it was sort of hypocrisy for us to lament passing a bill without finding out what's in it and then to do the same thing," Garrett said Thursday.
"But I think that was with the original [Republican] bill," Garrett said, referring to a prior version of the legislation, which was yanked from a planned vote in late March after GOP leaders saw it did not have enough votes to pass. He noted that the House had just 17 days to consider that first version.
"We now have [had] several months" to have consider the bill, Garrett said. "So that's how it's different from what happened in 2009."
Garrett said that lag has given analysts enough time to understand the implications of the bill.
The CBO's "score" of the original bill estimated that 24 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2026 than would be the case if Obamacare remained in place, and that individual premiums would be about 15 to 20 percent higher in the first two years of the bill becoming law.
Since the aborted vote in late March, Republicans have made a series of amendments to the bill, each of which would alter the CBO's original analysis of the legislation.