British Prime Minister Theresa May is expected to make a final attempt at persuading lawmakers to back her "new" Brexit deal on Wednesday but the agreement — and May's...Europe Politicsread more
Consumers in China are taking to social media to express their support for Huawei as the U.S. government looks to ramp up pressure on the Chinese smartphone maker.Technologyread more
Tensions between the two parties have heightened in recent months as the campaign for seats in the Brussels and Strasbourg-based parliament has crescendoed.Europe Politicsread more
Shares of Saudi shopping mall operator Arabian Centres were trading at 24.34 riyals ($6.49) in early deals in Riyadh.IPOsread more
There is at least one thing in common between the U.S. and Russia – their willingness to weaken the European Union, a top EU official said.Politicsread more
U.S. President Donald Trump's latest tariff increase — and Beijing's plans to counter them — are hitting U.S. companies in China, according to a joint survey this month by...China Economyread more
"We are also constantly watching whether the trade war will turn into a tech war," Ma said Tuesday, according to a CNBC translation of his Chinese remarks published by a locak...China Economyread more
TransferWise, the money transfer start-up, was valued at $3.5 billion after investors bought $292 million of shares in a secondary sale.Technologyread more
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's likely return to power for a second term will likely be positive for his country's growth, according to economists and investors.Asia Economyread more
Kohl's, J.C. Penney and Nordstrom release disappointing earnings news, putting a damper on their sector.Retailread more
"Pretty much the entire suite of apps that 'talk' over the internet could be vulnerable," said Tom Uren, a senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's...Cybersecurityread more
The Trump administration is taking aim at an Obama-era regulation intended to prevent companies from avoiding U.S. taxes by shifting profits out of the country.
The United States is one of the only developed nations that taxes businesses on income earned around the world. That has prompted a growing number of companies to move their headquarters overseas, such as Canadian Tim Horton's acquisition of Burger King. It has also encouraged foreign companies to buy U.S. companies, such as when Belgium's InBev purchased Anheuser-Busch.
President Barack Obama attempted to turn the tide with a raft of sweeping regulations in April 2016. The rules helped scuttle a planned $52 billion deal between drugmaker Abbvie and an Ireland's Shire as well as the $150 billion megamerger between Pfizer and Allergan, also headquartered in Ireland.
Now, the Treasury Department is rethinking one of the most controversial of those rules, one that deals with "earnings stripping." That's when companies load up their U.S. operations with debt and move profits to foreign subsidiaries. Business groups have railed against it as executive overreach with expensive consequences. Under Obama, the Treasury Department estimated it would cost companies $285 million to comply with the regulation, but companies argue that number is too low.
"It is great to see the [Trump] administration recognize the detrimental impact that these regulations will have on America's economic competitiveness," Nancy McLernon, chief executive of the Organization for International Investment, said in a statement.
The White House ordered Treasury this spring to conduct a sweeping review of all tax regulations written during Obama's last calendar year in office. The executive order directed the agency to find rules that were too costly or complex or that overstepped Treasury's authority.
The interim results were made public Friday. Treasury identified eight rules that it said met at least one of the first two criteria, with the earnings stripping regulation the most significant on the list. Treasury said it will propose reforms ranging from streamlining to full repeal by Sept. 18.
McLernon's organization and other influential interest groups, such as the Business Roundtable, have been calling on the White House to delay implementing the earnings stripping rule, which is slated to take effect Jan. 1, or rescind. Her organization said an analysis by PwC found a single Fortune 100 company would likely spend an initial $4 million to comply with the regulation and $1 million each year after that.
"If the regulations are left on the books and enter into full effect, they will increase the complexity of doing business in the United States," trade groups including Business Roundtable said in a letter this spring. "We believe they will frustrate this administration's goals of improving the US business climate, enhancing America's global competitiveness, and driving economic growth and job creation — for all multinational businesses operating in the United States."
The rule requires companies to provide additional documentation when lending money from foreign operations to those based in the United States. Under Obama, Treasury argued that the transactions amounted to transfer of equity — not debt — and therefore were not subject to preferential tax treatment. Business groups said the agency was not authorized to make that distinction.
"A number of these companies would essentially do a bookkeeping transaction," said Mark Mazur, who oversaw the development of the regulations as Treasury's assistant secretary for tax policy under Obama and now directs the Tax Policy Center. "There was no connection to whether that was truly repaid ... or whether the interest rate was close to commercial term."
However, Treasury will not review related rules also proposed in 2016 that were aimed at stopping inversions, in which a smaller, foreign company acquires a larger, U.S. company for tax purposes. Instead, the Trump administration has focused on reforming the tax code, including lower rates for corporations that officials have said would end the incentive for businesses to invert in the first place.
"We're not going to do anything under this administration that inadvertently makes U.S. business less competitive or encourages U.S. business to go abroad," Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in April, when the review was announced. "We are focused on making U.S. business the most competitive in the world, giving them the tools, and bringing back trillions of dollars."