Investors are rushing into the relative safe haven of the bond market, causing the yield on the U.S. 10-year Treasury to plummet.Real Estateread more
Stocks fell sharply on Thursday as investors started to fear the U.S.-China trade war is slowing the economy.Marketsread more
The charges allege he published secret documents obtained by former Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, some of which included the disclosure of foreigners who were...Politicsread more
See which stocks are posting big moves after the bell on Thursday, May 23.Market Insiderread more
Wall Street is becoming convinced that both the White House and Beijing are willing to engage in a protracted trade war that could begin to hit consumers and slow global...Market Insiderread more
Sentiment is "not negative enough to trigger a huge rally ... unless we get some kind of real breakthrough with China," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison disclosed a $1 billion stake in Tesla in late December. It's now worth about $580 million.Technologyread more
Investors rushed into the safety of bonds Thursday and sold stocks, as it appeared the trade war could be prolonged and more painful for the world economy than expected.Market Insiderread more
The e-mail's optimistic tone helped Tesla shares turn positive for the first time in seven days.Technologyread more
The president signaled that he is open to negotiating U.S. restrictions on the Chinese telecom giant as part of a broader trade deal, even as he called Huawei a "very...Politicsread more
"We still haven't seen the big estimate cuts that we can expect from the analysts who weren't expecting President Trump to keep raising tariffs," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
Brett Kavanaugh, for the U.S. Supreme Court, is not a fan of net neutrality.
The former clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy and current D.C. Circuit Court justice issued a blistering dissent last year in a ruling upholding the Federal Communications Commission’s net neutrality rule, and said that even if Congress had passed a net neutrality law, it would have been unconstitutional.
Advocates of net neutrality argue that without such regulation, which requires ISPs to treat all internet traffic as equal, ISPs like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon could charge more for various activities, such as video streaming, which takes up more bandwidth. This would then create a tiered system and stifle the free flow of information, they argue.
In his dissent, Kavanaugh said that the Obama-era FCC rule was not authorized by Congress and undermines the government’s separation of powers. “The net neutrality rule is unlawful and must be vacated,” he wrote.
That rule was reversed by the FCC under President Trump in December. In January, including California, New York and Virginia filed suit in the federal appeals court in Washington against the FCC for its decision.
In the same dissent, Kavanaugh argued that net neutrality violates the First Amendment, “because the rule impermissibly infringes on the Internet service providers’ editorial discretion.” Meaning even if net neutrality was legislated, he would still find it unconstitutional.
That could be a problem for states looking to instate their own net neutrality legislation in the wake of the FCC’s decision, , where such a bill is poised to pass. Oregon, Vermont and Washington have already enacted net neutrality legislation.
Kavanaugh could be approved by the Senate as soon as this autumn, if Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell gets his way.
A net neutrality case has not yet been brought before the Supreme Court, with the most significant decision so far being the very ruling Kavanaugh dissented against. It is unclear where exactly the other Supreme Court justices stand on the issue, but Kavanaugh has made his position known.
Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC and CNBC.com.