Judge bars mention of Mueller's collusion probe from ex-Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort's second trial

  • A federal judge rules that special counsel Robert Mueller's probe of possible collusion between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign could not be discussed during the upcoming trial of his former campaign boss Paul Manafort.
  • The ongoing collusion investigation is "wholly irrelevant to the charges in this case," she says.
  • Manafort's lawyers had also asked that any information related to Manafort's work for the Trump campaign be barred from the trial, even if it is "relevant," because it was politically volatile and could prejudice the jury.
President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort departs U.S. District Court after a hearing in the first charges stemming from a special counsel investigation of possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election in Washington, October 30, 2017.
Jim Bourg | Reuters
President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Paul Manafort departs U.S. District Court after a hearing in the first charges stemming from a special counsel investigation of possible Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election in Washington, October 30, 2017.

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that special counsel Robert Mueller's probe of possible collusion between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign could not be discussed during the upcoming trial of Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who is accused of money laundering, among other crimes.

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who is presiding over Manafort's criminal trial in Washington, D.C., said during a court hearing that the ongoing collusion investigation was "wholly irrelevant to the charges in this case."

Lawyers for Manafort had used the same language in a motion filed to Jackson in July, contending that any "evidence or argument" related to "the campaign's alleged collusion with the Russian government is wholly irrelevant" to Manafort's charges.

They had also asked that any information related to Manafort's work for the Trump campaign be barred from the trial, even if it was "relevant," because such information is politically volatile and could prejudice the jury.

The government noted in its response that it did "not intend to present in its case-in-chief evidence or argument concerning collusion" and did not oppose that portion of Manafort's request. But "Manafort's role in the Trump campaign, however, is relevant to the false-statement offenses," Mueller's prosecutors added.

They argued that press scrutiny about Manafort's activities as a lobbyist only intensified in 2016 because of his prominent role on the Trump campaign.

It's unclear at this time whether the judge will allow that line of questioning.

Manafort faces seven counts in his second trial on charges brought by Mueller's team, including conspiracy to launder money, witness tampering and lying to the government. That trial is set to begin jury selection on Sept. 17, with opening statements scheduled to start a week later.

On Aug. 21, a jury in Manafort's first federal criminal trial in Alexandria found him guilty of eight counts of tax and bank fraud charges. The judge in that case, T.S. Ellis, declared a mistrial on 10 other charges as the jury was reportedly deadlocked because of a single member.

The charges in both trials relate mainly to work Manafort performed and money he made as a consultant for a pro-Ukraine political party years before joining the Trump campaign. Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman for nearly three months during the summer of 2016.

Manafort's defense team had also asked to preclude any mention of the collusion probe from the Alexandria case. Ellis had denied that request as moot, noting that "the government indicated that it did not intend to introduce any such evidence."