More than 26 million people shared their DNA with ancestry firms, allowing researchers to trace relationships between virtually all Americans: MIT

  • More than 26 million people have taken a consumer DNA test so far.
  • The MIT Technology Review predicts that number will rise to 100 million in 24 months.
  • Last year's sales alone equaled that of 2012 through 2017 combined.
More than 80 percent of 23andMe customers agree to let the company share their DNA with research partners.
Getty Images
More than 80 percent of 23andMe customers agree to let the company share their DNA with research partners.

More than 26 million people — more people than in all of Australia — have shared their DNA with one of the four leading ancestry and health databases, allowing researchers to extrapolate data on virtually all Americans and raising some serious privacy concerns, according to the MIT Technology Review.

Consumers purchased the same number of at-home DNA tests in 2018 as in all previous years since 2012 combined, according to the publication. If the trend continues, the companies could house the genetic information of over 100 million people — about a third of the U.S. population — within two years.

"For consumers, the tests — which cost as little as $59 — offer entertainment, clues to ancestry, and a chance of discovering family secrets, such as siblings you didn't know about," according to MIT Technology Review. "But the consequences for privacy go well beyond that. As these databases grow, they have made it possible to trace the relationships between nearly all Americans, including those who never purchased a test."

Ancestry and 23andMe are the two main players in the genetic and ancestry testing business, with Ancestry collecting 14 million DNA samples as of Jan. 1 and 23andMe collecting 9 million samples. The other companies reported a combined total of 3.5 million samples collected.

"We have noticed an increasing number of people becoming interested in genetic testing," said Jon Ward, vice president of consumer marketing and acquisition at 23andMe. "Consumers are interested in discovering a range of information about themselves, from learning more of their background and where their ancestors came from, to identifying lost relatives or learning more about their health."

MIT Technology Review used public statements from ancestry companies, data maintained by the International Society of Genetic Genealogy, data tracked by a genealogy blogger and its own reporting to count total users. The companies don't release numbers at the same time, so MIT picked numbers released closest to Jan. 1.

In order to calculate 2019 results, MIT Technology Review used Ancestry's data reported Nov. 29, 2018. But that data lacks Christmas season sales, which could have added around a million people, according to the article.

Police have used DNA results from an ancestry company database to identify criminals. Most notably, in 2018, investigators cited such data when they named Joseph James DeAngelo Jr., 72, a former police officer, as the Golden State Killer, who murdered at least 12 people and raped 45 in California in the 1970s and '80s. DeAngelo was arrested and faces murder charges.

MIT said the four biggest ancestry companies have previously promised they wouldn't let police search their databases without a warrant. But Family Tree DNA recently changed its policy and allowed the FBI to upload DNA samples from crime scenes, according to the MIT publication.

"The unilateral change in policy — which users weren't alerted to — is troubling because it means that our DNA, just like our posts on social media or our location data, is at the mercy of user agreements none of us have any control over or even bother to read," the MIT publication said.

Of course, there are things you can't unlearn. 23andMe's privacy statement warns: "You may discover things about yourself and/or your family members that may be upsetting or cause anxiety and that you may not have the ability to control or change."

A spokeswoman for Ancestry declined to comment for this story.