Chinese officials are expected to be in Washington this week to hold consultations with the U.S. ahead of high-level trade talks in October.World Economyread more
Saudi Arabia's defense spending is the world's third-largest — behind the U.S. and China, says Gary Grappo, former U.S. ambassador to Oman.Energyread more
President Donald Trump said Monday he's in no rush to respond to a coordinated attack that hit Saudi Arabia's oil industry over the weekend.Marketsread more
The price of oil could go sharply higher, depending on the duration of the disruption at Saudi oil facilities and whether there is a military response.Powering the Futureread more
Energy stocks, one of the worst-performing sectors this year, spiked Monday after an attack on Saudi Arabia's heart of oil production Saturday sent oil prices soaring.Marketsread more
The Saudi-led military coalition battling Yemen's Houthi movement said on Monday that the attack on Saudi oil plants was carried out by Iranian weapons and did not originate...Oilread more
After a series of setbacks on the road to an initial public offering, the parent company of real estate start-up WeWork is delaying the move, sources told CNBC Monday.Technologyread more
"The United States military, with our interagency team, is working with our partners to address this unprecedented attack and defend the international rules-based order that...Politicsread more
Crude oil's spike following attacks on Saudi Arabia's energy supply has experts weighing whether or not the gains will last.ETF Edgeread more
"In the old days, the averages would've plunged on this kind of oil shock. I know because I've lived through a bunch of them, starting in 1973," Jim Cramer says.Mad Money with Jim Cramerread more
Traders in the fed funds futures market on Monday were pricing in a 34% chance that the Fed will stay put on rates.The Fedread more
California's high-speed rail agency on Monday asked the Trump administration to reconsider its plans to pull funding from the state's bullet train project. It also warned that any "clawback" of federal funds already spent "would be disastrous."
Last month, President Donald Trump called for California to return $3.5 billion in federal funds for the high-speed rail line planned between the San Francisco and Los Angeles. The U.S. Department of Transportation followed by announcing its intention to cancel $929 million in grant funds awarded previously but not yet paid out.
"Gov. [Gavin] Newsom's recent public expression of support for delivering high-speed rail in California does not constitute a fundamental change in the purpose of the overall project for which federal funding was awarded," Brian Kelly, CEO of the California High Speed Rail Authority said in a letter dated March 4 to Federal Railroad Administration head Ronald Batory.
The Department of Transportation said late Monday that the Federal Railroad Administration had received the California High Speed Rail Authority's response and is reviewing the statement.
Construction is underway on the first leg of the bullet train, a 119-mile section in the state's Central Valley. More than $6 billion has already been spent on the California high-speed rail project.
Newsom at his first state of the state address on Feb. 12 announced a reeling in of the state's high-speed rail project, saying the current plan "would cost too much and take too long." He added, "There simply isn't a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to L.A."
"In fact, the Governor described a pragmatic approach to using the funding now committed to this project to get high-speed trains on the ground in California as soon as possible — by completing an early high-speed rail link operating in the Central Valley between Merced and Bakersfield," Kelly's letter stated. The California rail official also said the state plans to continue its regional project in the north and south while also finishing required environmental clearances on segments from San Francisco to Southern California.
The California rail agency claims that it already met the government's statutory deadline required for spending more than $2.5 billion in federal funds for the high-speed rail project.
In addition, Kelly said it "would be unwarranted, unprecedented, and harmful to the project and to the people of the Central Valley, the State of California, and the nation" for the administration to terminate the 2010 agreement for about $929 million in federal funds for the rail system.
"Moreover, any 'clawback' of federal funds already expended on this project would be disastrous policy," Kelly said.
A business plan released in early 2018 by the state rail agency warned the cost of the 500-mile system could approach nearly $100 billion.